Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist RIMG advertisement
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; June 1998; v. 83; no. 5-6; p. 590-606
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gualtieri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Crystal structure-crystal chemistry relationships in the zeolites erionite and offretite

A. Gualtieri, G. Artioli, E. Passaglia, S. Bigi, A. Viani, and J. C. Hanson

Universita di Modena, Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Modena, Italy

This study clarifies the crystal structure variations and relationships in the zeolites erionite and offretite. The crystal structure analyses used Rietveld analysis of X-ray powder diffraction data, obtained both by synchrotron radiation and conventional X-ray sources, and on diffraction patterns obtained by transmission electron microscopy. The framework Al atoms in erionite are preferentially located in the single six-membered ring of tetrahedra (T2 site), whereas the Si-Al distribution is essentially disordered on the tetrahedral framework sites in offretite. In both zeolites, the center of the cancrinite cage is always occupied by K cations in similar amounts in both minerals. The erionite cage in erionite is occupied by Ca and Na atoms distributed on four distinct cation sites. Mg ions can be present up to 0.8 atoms per cell and are located between the Ca1 and Ca3 sites and very close to the Ca2 site on the symmetry axis. In offretite, the Mg site is located on the trigonal axis of the gmelinite cage and the Mg atoms are bonded to a variable number (five or six) of H 2 O molecules, depending on the site population. The structural data and TEM analysis clearly show that the crystal chemistry of the extraframework cations, Mg in particular, is a major factor controlling whether erionite or offretite crystallizes, the Si-A1 distribution in the framework, and the possible stacking intergrowths of the two minerals.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
P. Ballirano, G. B. Andreozzi, M. Dogan, and A. U. Dogan
Crystal structure and iron topochemistry of erionite-K from Rome, Oregon, U.S.A.
American Mineralogist, August 1, 2009; 94(8-9): 1262 - 1270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
A. U. Dogan
Zeolite Mineralogy and Cappadocian Erionite
Indoor and Built Environment, October 1, 2003; 12(5): 337 - 342.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J MineralHome page
S. QUARTIERI, M. TRISCARI, and A. VIANI
Crystal structure of the hydrated sulphate pickeringite (MgAl2(SO4)4{middle dot}22H2O): X-ray powder diffraction study
European Journal of Mineralogy, December 1, 2000; 12(6): 1131 - 1138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America