Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist house ad
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; February 1999; v. 84; no. 1-2; p. 138-143
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harris, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Computer simulation of pressure-induced structural transitions in MgO [001] tilt grain boundaries

Duncan J. Harris, Graeme W. Watson, and Stephen C. Parker

University of Bath, School of Chemistry, Bath, United Kingdom

Atomistic simulations using lattice and molecular dynamics were carried out on the {210}, {310}, and {410} tilt grain boundaries of MgO as a function of pressure up to 100 GPa at a single temperature of 600 K. The calculations show a significant change in the structure of the tilt grain boundaries as pressure increases. The results show that, beyond the previously identified reversible pressure induced collapse of the channel structure, an irreversible shear was identified that forms a mirror grain boundary, which does not possess well-defined dislocation cores and is consequently denser. These mirror boundaries are energetically more favorable than the symmetric boundaries at elevated pressures. As applied pressure approaches 100 GPa a reversible structural transition occurs causing the boundaries to shear perpendicular to the boundary plane forming highly dense structures that contained seven coordinate ions at the boundary and the presence of an edge dislocation-like structure. We suggest that differences between the boundary structures seen in the HREM studies with those predicted by simulations may result from stresses upon the crystal during preparation causing irreversible shearing.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
N. H. de Leeuw, S. C. Parker, C. R. A. Catlow, and G. D. Price
Proton-containing defects at forsterite {010} tilt grain boundaries and stepped surfaces
American Mineralogist, September 1, 2000; 85(9): 1143 - 1154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America