Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; March 1999; v. 84; no. 3; p. 435-446
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibbs, G. V.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Laplacian and bond critical point properties of the electron density distributions of sulfide bonds; a comparison with oxide bonds

G. V. Gibbs, Osamu Tamada, M. B. Boisen, and F. C. Hill

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Departments of Geological Sciences, Materials Science and Engineering and Mathematics, Blacksburg, VA, United States

Topological and bond critical point properties of electron density distributions, p(r), were calculated for a series of sulfide molecules, containing first- and second-row main group M-cations. Laplacian maps of the distributions show that the valence shell charge concentration (VSCC) of the sulfide anion is highly polarized and extended into the internuclear region of the M-S bonds, coalescing with the VSCCs of the more electronegative first-row cations. On the other hand, maps for a corresponding set of oxide molecules show that the oxide anion tends to be less polarized and more locally concentrated in the vicinity of its valence shell, particularly when bonded to second-row M-cations. A search for extrema in the distributions reveals maxima in the VSCCs that can be ascribed to bonded and nonbonded electron pairs. The different and distinctive properties of sulfides and oxides are examined in terms of the number and the positions of the electron pairs and the topographic features of the Laplacian maps. The evidence provided by the electron density distributions and its topological properties indicates that the bonded interactions in sulfides are more directional, for a given M-cation, than in oxides. The value of the electron density distribution at the bond critical point and the length of a given M-S bond are reliable measures of a bonded interaction, the greater the accumulation of the electron density and the shorter the bond, the greater its shared (covalent) interaction.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
D. J. Vaughan and K. M. Rosso
Chemical Bonding in Sulfide Minerals
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 61(1): 231 - 264.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
U. Becker and K. M. Rosso
Step edges on galena (100): Probing the basis for defect driven surface reactivity at the atomic scale
American Mineralogist, July 1, 2001; 86(7-8): 862 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America