Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; June 1999; v. 84; no. 5-6; p. 884-894
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rakovan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hochella, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Aspects of goethite surface microtopography, structure, chemistry, and reactivity

John Rakovan, Udo Becker, and Michael F. Hochella

Miami University, Department of Geology, Oxford, OH, United States
Universitaet Muenster, Federal Republic of Germany
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, United States

Goethite (010), (110), and (111) growth faces and (010) cleavage surfaces of large, natural single crystals, as well as a high surface area synthetic sample were characterized using various surface sensitive microscopies and spectroscopies. Differential interference contrast and atomic force microscopy characterization of the natural single crystal faces showed microtopography indicative of growth, dissolution, and cleavage. Low energy electron diffraction patterns of the goethite (010) surface exhibit sharp, intense diffraction spots, indicating long-range order on this important surface. These patterns have two-dimensional point group symmetry 2 mm, consistent with an undistorted surface structure and unit-cell parameters a = 4.62 + or - 0.14 Aa and c = 2.99 + or - 0.08 Aa. These parameters equal the equivalent bulk cell dimensions given the uncertainties. Ultra-high vacuum scanning tunneling microscopy was performed on (010) cleavage faces, although the tunneling properties of the surface were very heterogeneous. Atomic resolution was not obtained; however, microtopographic images are identical to those collected with AFM. XPS spectra from the (010) faces of two natural samples as well as the synthetic powder all have peak maxima for Fe (2p (sub 3/2) ) at 711.5 + or - 0.1 eV. The O(ls) line originating from the goethite can be fit with two peaks with a chemical shift of 1.3 eV. The peak at higher binding energy (531.3 eV + or - 0.1 eV) represents the protonated oxygen in the structure, and the peak at lower binding energy (530.0 eV + or - 0.1 eV) represents the proton-free oxygen in the structure. Ab initio and semi-empirical models of the (010) surface suggest that cleavage occurs through the hydroxide plane at 1/4 b in the structure. This is contrary to cleavage through the oxide plane at 1/2 b, which has been assumed in several previous studies.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
R. T. Downs, R. T. Downs, and M. Hall-Wallace
The American Mineralogist crystal structure database
American Mineralogist, January 1, 2003; 88(1): 247 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
J. Rakovan and J. A. Jaszczak
Multiple length scale growth spirals on metamorphic graphite {001} surfaces studied by atomic force microscopy
American Mineralogist, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 17 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America