Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist house ad
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; June 1999; v. 84; no. 5-6; p. 965-969
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rossouw, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Location of interstitial Cr in mullite by incoherent channeling patterns from characteristic X-ray emission

C. J. Rossouw, and P. R. Miller

CSIRO Division of Manufacturing Science and Technology, Clayton South, Australia

The use of a direct crystallographic technique is reported for locating Cr atomic sites in a mullite containing 11.5 wt% Cr 2 O 3 by monitoring variations in characteristic X-ray emission rates as a function of fast electron beam orientation. Systematic examination of two dimensional incoherent channeling patterns (ICP), formed from characteristic X-ray emissions from Al, Si, and Cr, and recorded near low index zone axis orientations, has enabled the preferred lattice position of Cr in mullite to be identified as the interstitial site 0, 0.25,0. Although the method of atom location by channeling enhanced microanalysis (or ALCHEMI) generally has been applied in situations where introduced minority atom species are accommodated in substitutional atomic positions, this study illustrates the identification of an interstitial site of an introduced dopant species. This result does not coincide with that derived from X-ray Rietveld refinement. The ICP method is analytically robust and, unlike Rietveld refinement, does not require a highly accurate model of the host lattice framework and composition. ICP analysis therefore may be more appropriate for this particular application.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
R. X. Fischer and H. Schneider
Crystal structure of Cr-mullite
American Mineralogist, September 1, 2000; 85(9): 1175 - 1179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America