Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; February 2000; v. 85; no. 2; p. 321-328
© 2000 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hama, J.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, O. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Thermoelasticity of silicate perovskites and magnesiowustite and its implications for the Earth’s lower mantle

Juichiro Hama1,*, Kaichi Suito1 and Orson L. Anderson2

1 Division of Material Physics, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-8531, Japan
2 Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California at Los Angels, Los Angeles 90024, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: hama{at}user.center.osaka-u.ac.jp

By assuming an ideal two-component mixture of (Mg,Fe)SiO3 perovskite (MgPv) and (Mg,Fe)O magnesiowüstite (Mw), and by using a thermoelastic model for mantle minerals developed previously, we can reproduce the PREM values of density and velocities vP and vS of compressional and shear waves of the lower mantle within ±0.12%, ±0.28%, and ±0.56% except for the transition layers at the both boundaries. The molar fractions and atomic fractions of iron for MgPv and Mw were adjusted to reproduce the PREM values of {rho}, vP, and vS above the point of z = 871 km (which is slightly inside the lower mantle) under constant-entropy condition. This depth avoids the boundary effect. The adiabatic bulk and shear moduli of the mixture are calculated by the Hashin-Shtrikman method for MgPv and Mw and then arithmetically averaged. The temperature profile was calculated assuming that the lower mantle is adiabatic and T(670 km) = 1873 K. The temperature at the top of D'' becomes 2444 K. Being added the temperature increment of 840 K over D’’ (z = 2741–2891 km) estimated by Stacey and Loper (1983) to our value, the temperature at the core-mantle boundary (CMB) becomes 3284 K in agreement with T(CMB) of 3300 ± 500 °C by Brown and McQueen. The molar ratios of Fe/(Mg + Fe) and (Mg + Fe)/Si become 0.12 and 2.10. The calculated thermal expansivity, {alpha}, of the mixture under lower mantle conditions is in agreement with {alpha} of the lower mantle calculated directly from PEM data by Brown and Shankland, and Anderson. For the addition of 5 mol% of CaSiO3 perovskite to our model, the essential feature of the result is unchanged and the wt% of SiO2, MgO, FeO, and CaO become 40.7, 44.6, 11.0, and 3.7.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by Mineralogical Society of America