Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; February 2000; v. 85; no. 2; p. 345-353
© 2000 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stacey, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Isaak, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Extrapolation of lower mantle properties to zero pressure: Constraints on composition and temperature

Frank D. Stacey1 and Donald G. Isaak2,3,*

1 CSIRO Exploration and Mining, P.O. Box 883, Kenmore, Queensland 4069, Australia
2 Center for Physics and Chemistry of Planets, Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095–1567, U.S.A.
3 Department of Mathematics and Physics, Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, California, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: disaak{at}adam.igpp.ucla.edu

The approximation, ({partial}K's/{partial}T)P=0 {approx} 0, where K's = ({partial}Ks/{partial}P)S, KS is the adiabatbbic bulk modulus, and P, T, and S represent pressure, temperature, and entropy, is often used, or implicitly assumed, to simplify the interpretation of lower mantle properties when determining plausible mineralogy of that region. This approximation is now found to be unsatisfactory, and a more general treatment gives a positive value which increases strongly with K's. We find that ({partial}K's/{partial}T)P=0 is (6 to 23) x 10–5K–1 for the lower mantle. The behavior of this higher order derivative necessitates a reconsideration of the lower mantle equation-of-state fitting by requiring a higher value of K'S0 (K'S at P = 0) than usually considered. The value of K'S0 (T0) where T0 is the potential temperature, cannot reasonably be less than about 4.2 and may be as high as 4.6, depending on the uncertain value of K'S0 (290 K) for silicate perovskite. There is some trade-off between T0 and composition, but if a simple mixture of perovskite and magnesiowüstite is assumed, the total iron content is found to be Fe/(Fe + Mg) = 0.22, independent of both T0 and uncertainty in K'S0 for perovskite. This implausibly high iron content can be attributed to neglect of the presence of Ca perovskite. We therefore conclude that Ca perovskite is an important constituent of the lower mantle and that it is seismologically conspicuous.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America