Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist RIMG advertisement
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; March 2000; v. 85; no. 3-4; p. 397-406
© 2000 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cook, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Iron concentration and the physical processes of dynamic oxidation in an alkaline earth aluminosilicate glass

Glen B. Cook1,* and Reid F. Cooper1,2,{dagger}

1 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, U.S.A.
2 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, U.S.A.

Correspondence: {dagger} E-mail: cooper{at}engr.wisc.edu

Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy was used to investigate the persistence of cation-diffusion-limited oxidation in three, low-Fe2+-bearing MgO-Al2O3-SiO2 glasses (base glass compositions along the enstatite-cordierite-liquid cotectic; total Fe levels of 0.04, 0.19, and 0.54 at%). The glasses were reacted in air at temperatures of 700–850 °C (~Tg), and changes in the composition of the near-surface region (≤2.5 µm) of the glass resulting from oxidation were characterized. The reaction morphology produced by oxidation at temperatures above 800 °C, for all of the glasses studied regardless of Fe concentration, was consistent uniquely with an oxidation process dominated by diffusion of Fe2+ cations to the free surface that was charge compensated by a (counter) flux of electron holes into the material. In the high-Fe material (0.54 at%), the activation energy for the cation-diffusion-limited reaction was estimated at ~475 kJ/mol. Below 800 °C, the two glasses with lowest Fe concentration displayed a reaction morphology consistent with oxidation occurring by the motion of an oxygen species. High levels of transition metal cations are not required to ensure the dominance of cation-diffusion-limited oxidation reaction in silicate glasses and melts; thus, monitoring internal Fe3+:Fe2+ equilibrium, even at trace amounts, seems untenable as an indicator of the diffusion behavior of molecular or ionic oxygen.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
M. Roskosz, M. J. Toplis, D. R. Neuville, and B. O. Mysen
Amorphous materials: Properties, structure, and durability: Quantification of the kinetics of iron oxidation in silicate melts using Raman spectroscopy and assessment of the role of oxygen diffusion
American Mineralogist, November 1, 2008; 93(11-12): 1749 - 1759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
F. Gaillard, F. Gaillard, M. Pichavant, S. Mackwell, R. Champallier, B. Scaillet, and C. McCammon
Chemical transfer during redox exchanges between H2 and Fe-bearing silicate melts
American Mineralogist, February 1, 2003; 88(2-3): 308 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
F. Gaillard, B. Scaillet, and M. Pichavant
Kinetics of iron oxidation-reduction in hydrous silicic melts
American Mineralogist, July 1, 2002; 87(7): 829 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
C. Freda, D.R. Baker, and L. Ottolini
Reduction of water loss from gold-palladium capsules during piston-cylinder experiments by use of pyrophyllite powder
American Mineralogist, March 1, 2001; 86(3): 234 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America