Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist RIMG advertisement
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; March 2000; v. 85; no. 3-4; p. 543-556
© 2000 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Schoonen, M. A.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The absolute energy positions of conduction and valence bands of selected semiconducting minerals

Yong Xu and Martin A.A. Schoonen*

Department of Geosciences, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794-2100, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: mschoonen{at}notes.cc.sunysb.edu

The absolute energy positions of conduction and valence band edges were compiled for about 50 each semiconducting metal oxide and metal sulfide minerals. The relationships between energy levels at mineral semiconductor-electrolyte interfaces and the activities of these minerals as a catalyst or photocatalyst in aqueous redox reactions are reviewed. The compilation of band edge energies is based on experimental flatband potential data and complementary empirical calculations from electronegativities of constituent elements. Whereas most metal oxide semiconductors have valence band edges 1 to 3 eV below the H2O oxidation potential (relative to absolute vacuum scale), energies for conduction band edges are close to, or lower than, the H2O reduction potential. These oxide minerals are strong photo-oxidation catalysts in aqueous solutions, but are limited in their reducing power. Non-transition metal sulfides generally have higher conduction and valence band edge energies than metal oxides; therefore, valence band holes in non-transition metal sulfides are less oxidizing, but conduction band electrons are exceedingly reducing. Most transition-metal sulfides, however, are characterized by small band gaps (<1 eV) and band edges situated within or close to the H2O stability potentials. Hence, both the oxidizing power of the valence band holes and the reducing power of the conduction band electrons are lower than those of non-transition metal sulfides.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
M. A. A. Schoonen, C. A. Cohn, E. Roemer, R. Laffers, S. R. Simon, and T. O'Riordan
Mineral-Induced Formation of Reactive Oxygen Species
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 64(1): 179 - 221.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
B. Gilbert and J. F. Banfield
Molecular-Scale Processes Involving Nanoparticulate Minerals in Biogeochemical Systems
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2005; 59(1): 109 - 155.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
Y. Narita and H. Murotani
Submicrometer optical characterization of the grain boundary of optically active Cr3+ doped polycrystalline Al2O3 by near-field spectroscopy
American Mineralogist, August 1, 2002; 87(8-9): 1144 - 1147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America