Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist house ad
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; September 2000; v. 85; no. 9; p. 1217-1222
© 2000 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanchar, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sturchio, N. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Quantification of minor phases in growth kinetics experiments with powder X-ray diffraction

John M. Hanchar1,*, Kathryn L. Nagy2,{dagger}, Paul Fenter1, Robert J. Finch1, Donald J. Beno1,{ddagger} and Neil C. Sturchio1,§

1 Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439, U.S.A.
2 Geochemistry Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185, U.S.A.

Correspondence: § E-mail: sturchio{at}anl.gov

Minor amounts of clay minerals precipitated from aqueous solution can be rapidly identified and quantified in a mineral mixture with powder X-ray diffraction using a rotating-anode source and a position-sensitive detector. For the case of gibbsite precipitated on a kaolinite powder substrate we demonstrate a simple method having a minimum detection limit of 0.1 wt%, using pure gibbsite as the intensity reference in mechanical mixtures of gibbsite and kaolinite. The amount of gibbsite precipitated onto kaolinite at 80 °C, pH 3 is higher when determined from solution chemistry than from the X-ray method, and the difference in amounts increases with increasing Al concentration in solution. This discrepancy can be explained by assuming that a fraction of the precipitated material is effectively invisible to the X-ray diffraction technique, either due to a small diffracting domain size along the gibbsite [001] direction or formation of an Al-phase that is amorphous to X-rays. This method should be generally useful for a range of mineral mixtures where at least one intense reflection for the phase of interest is not obscured. The ability to identify, characterize, and quantify trace phases by X-ray diffraction, especially when combined with surface analysis by electron or atomic force imaging, is an important complement to the conventional approach of monitoring solution composition in growth kinetics experiments.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America