Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; March 2001; v. 86; no. 3; p. 318-326
© 2001 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nesbitt, H.W.
Right arrow Articles by Szargan, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

XPS measurement of fivefold and sixfold coordinated sulfur in pyrrhotites and evidence for millerite and pyrrhotite surface species

H.W. Nesbitt1,*, A.G. Schaufuss2, M. Scaini3, G.M. Bancroft3 and R. Szargan2

1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 5B7, Canada
2 Wilhelm-Ostwald-Institut, Fakultät für Chemie und Mineralogie, Universität Leipzig, Linnéstrasse 2, D-O4103, Germany
3 Deptartment of Chemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 5B7, Canada

Correspondence: * E-mail address: hwn{at}julian.uwo.ca

Collection of S 2p XPS spectra of millerite (NiS), using a conventional (AlK{alpha}) and a synchrotron photon source, demonstrates the presence of one surface species on millerite (NiS) and spectral deconvolution indicates a second surface contribution. The observed surface core-level shift (binding energy = 161.1 eV) is attributed to a surface monomeric species (S2–) whereas the second contribution probably is a surface dimeric species (S22–, binding energy = 162.3 eV). Surface dimers, if present, indicate surface reconstruction of millerite surfaces upon cleavage. Monoclinic (Fe7S8) and hexagonal (Fe10S11) pyrrhotite are non-stoichiometric due to vacancies on metal sites. The conventional S 2p XPS spectra of these phases, which sample primarily bulk sulfur states, reveal contributions from fivefold and sixfold coordinated S atoms, the proportion of which is consistent with structural refinement studies. The more intense signal is derived from S in fivefold coordination (80–85%) and the remainder represents the sixfold contribution. Comparison of a highly surface sensitive S 2p XPS spectrum of pyrrhotite (photon energy tuned to 210 eV) with a conventional S 2p XPS signal (AlK{alpha} source) indicates the presence of a monomeric surface species (S2–). Spectral deconvolution of the surface sensitive spectrum indicates another contribution near 162 eV, the origin of which is uncertain. It may represent S atoms in sixfold coordination, surface dimers (S22–) or both.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
K. M. Rosso and D. J. Vaughan
Sulfide Mineral Surfaces
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 61(1): 505 - 556.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Can MineralHome page
S. L. Harmer, A. R. Pratt, H. W. Nesbitt, and M. E. Fleet
RECONSTRUCTION OF FRACTURE SURFACES ON BORNITE
Can Mineral, October 1, 2005; 43(5): 1619 - 1630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
S. L. Harmer, A. R. Pratt, W. H. Nesbitt, and M. E. Fleet
Sulfur species at chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) fracture surfaces
American Mineralogist, July 1, 2004; 89(7): 1026 - 1032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America