Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist RIMG advertisement
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; July 2001; v. 86; no. 7-8; p. 814-825
© 2001 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, K. T.
Right arrow Articles by Veblen, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Energy-filtered transmission electron microscopy (EFTEM) of intergrown pyroxenes

Kevin T. Moore*, David C. Elbert and David R. Veblen

Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: kt_moore{at}jhu.edu

It is demonstrated that energy-filtered transmission electron microscope (EFTEM) imaging in a conventional TEM (CTEM), equipped with a field-emission gun (FEG) electron source, can be used to characterize the local chemical distribution in exsolved pyroxenes. EFTEM imaging, which can be performed in one to tens of minutes, yields two-dimensional compositional maps that can have nanometer-scale resolution. The combination of electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) and EFTEM imaging with techniques such as bright-field and dark-field imaging, high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) imaging, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and electron diffraction allows for the chemical and structural characterization of any sample able to withstand the electron beam.

EFTEM imaging, HRTEM, and EDS data suggest that the augite -> orthopyroxene reaction in the samples examined occurs in two-steps; augite -> pigeonite -> orthopyroxene. In this two-step process, the chemical and structural components are accomplished separately, suggesting that it is energetically or kinetically favorable to dissociate the two components rather than have them occur simultaneously. This two-step transformation is supported by the pigeonite -> orthopyroxene transformation, which appears to be an isothermal martensitic transformation since the pigeonite and orthopyroxene compositions are identical within analytical error.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
K. T. Moore, D. R. Veblen, and J. M. Howe
Calcium segregation at antiphase boundaries in pigeonite
American Mineralogist, October 1, 2001; 86(10): 1314 - 1318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America