Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist house ad
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; January 2002; v. 87; no. 1; p. 171-175
© 2002 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (37)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Letter

Closure in crystal size distributions (CSD), verification of CSD calculations, and the significance of CSD fans

Michael D. Higgins1,*

Sciences de la Terre, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, G7H 2B1, Canada

Correspondence: * E-mail: mhiggins{at}uqac.ca

Crystal size distribution (CSD) measurements are susceptible to the closure problem, just like chemical compositions. In its simplest form this means that the total crystal content of a rock cannot exceed 100%. Where chemical or thermal effects limit the total quantity of a single phase, closure can occur at lower volumetric phase proportions. This means that parts of the CSD diagram [ln(population density) vs. size] are not accessible. If the volumetric phase proportion is constant, then straight CSDs will appear to rotate around a point at small sizes giving a fan of CSDs. These fans are significant and do show changes in crystal sizes that can be interpreted in terms of magmatic processes. However, the correlation between the slopes (or characteristic lengths) and intercepts of individual CSDs in a family is not significant, but just a consequence of the constant phase proportion effect. Many other graphs, such as characteristic length vs. volumetric phase proportion, can give more information on magmatic processes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
B. O'Driscoll, C. T. E. Stevenson, and V. R. Troll
Mineral Lamination Development in Layered Gabbros of the British Palaeogene Igneous Province: A Combined Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility, Quantitative Textural and Mineral Chemistry Study
J. Petrology, June 1, 2008; 49(6): 1187 - 1221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Can MineralHome page
J. D. Greenough and B. J. Fryer
TRACE-ELEMENT EVIDENCE FOR VOLATILE-INFLUENCED DIFFERENTIATION IN A FLOW OF ALKALI BASALT, PENG HU ISLAND, TAIWAN
Can Mineral, April 1, 2008; 46(2): 305 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. Berger, N. Ennih, J.-P. Liegeois, C. Nkono, J.-C. C. Mercier, and D. Demaiffe
A complex multi-chamber magmatic system beneath a late Cenozoic volcanic field: evidence from CSDs and thermobarometry of clinopyroxene from a single nephelinite flow (Djbel Saghro, Morocco)
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 297(1): 509 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
M. D. Higgins and D. Chandrasekharam
Nature of Sub-volcanic Magma Chambers, Deccan Province, India: Evidence from Quantitative Textural Analysis of Plagioclase Megacrysts in the Giant Plagioclase Basalts
J. Petrology, May 1, 2007; 48(5): 885 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
B. O'Driscoll, C. H. Donaldson, V. R. Troll, D. A. Jerram, and C. H. Emeleus
An Origin for Harrisitic and Granular Olivine in the Rum Layered Suite, NW Scotland: a Crystal Size Distribution Study
J. Petrology, February 1, 2007; 48(2): 253 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
J. S. GEE, W. P. MEURER, P. A. SELKIN, and M. J. CHEADLE
Quantifying Three-Dimensional Silicate Fabrics in Cumulates Using Cumulative Distribution Functions
J. Petrology, October 1, 2004; 45(10): 1983 - 2009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
A. ZEH
Crystal Size Distribution (CSD) and Textural Evolution of Accessory Apatite, Titanite and Allanite during Four Stages of Metamorphism: an Example from the Moine Supergroup, Scotland
J. Petrology, October 1, 2004; 45(10): 2101 - 2132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
S. BOORMAN, A. BOUDREAU, and F. J. KRUGER
The Lower Zone-Critical Zone Transition of the Bushveld Complex: a Quantitative Textural Study
J. Petrology, June 1, 2004; 45(6): 1209 - 1235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
D. A. JERRAM, M. J. CHEADLE, and A. R. PHILPOTTS
Quantifying the Building Blocks of Igneous Rocks: Are Clustered Crystal Frameworks the Foundation?
J. Petrology, November 1, 2003; 44(11): 2033 - 2051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
J. M. Castro, J. M. Castro, K. V. Cashman, and M. Manga
A technique for measuring 3D crystal-size distributions of prismatic microlites in obsidian
American Mineralogist, August 1, 2003; 88(8-9): 1230 - 1240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
M. D. HIGGINS and J. ROBERGE
Crystal Size Distribution of Plagioclase and Amphibole from Soufriere Hills Volcano, Montserrat: Evidence for Dynamic Crystallization-Textural Coarsening Cycles
J. Petrology, August 1, 2003; 44(8): 1401 - 1411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
I. PETRIK, P. I. NABELEK, M. JANAK, and D. PLASIENKA
Conditions of Formation and Crystallization Kinetics of Highly Oxidized Pseudotachylytes from the High Tatras (Slovakia)
J. Petrology, May 1, 2003; 44(5): 901 - 927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
D.D. Eberl, D. E. Kile, and V.A. Drits
On geological interpretations of crystal size distributions: Constant vs. proportionate growth
American Mineralogist, August 1, 2002; 87(8-9): 1235 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
Y. Pan
Comments on: Higgins: "Closure in crystal size distributions (CSD), verification of CSD calculations, and the significance of CSD fans"
American Mineralogist, August 1, 2002; 87(8-9): 1242 - 1243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
M. D. Higgins
Reply to comment on "Closure in crystal size distributions (CSD), verification of CSD calculations and the significance of CSD fans"
American Mineralogist, August 1, 2002; 87(8-9): 1244 - 1244.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America