Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; January 2002; v. 87; no. 1; p. 99-102
© 2002 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ono, S.
Right arrow Articles by Isshiki, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Phase boundary between rutile-type and CaCl2-type germanium dioxide determined by in situ X-ray observations

Shigeaki Ono1,2,*, Kei Hirose3, Norimasa Nishiyama1 and Maiko Isshiki4

1 Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Tokyo, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba 277-8581, Japan
2 Institute for Frontier Research on Earth Evolution, Japan Marine Science & Technology Center, 2-15 Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa 237-0061, Japan
3 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama 2-12-1, Meguro, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan
4 Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, Mikazuki-cho, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5198, Japan

In situ synchrotron X-ray experiments of the GeO2 system were made at pressures of 28–45 GPa and temperatures of 300–2300 K, using a diamond anvil cell combined with a laser heating and a 6–8 type multianvil high-pressure apparatus. We observed a second-order phase transition between tetragonal rutile-type (P42/mnm) and orthorhombic CaCl2-type (Pnnm) phases under high pressure and temperature. The transition kinetics seem to have little effect on the second-order phase transition because the cell constants exhibit no discontinuities between the phases. Therefore, the phase transitions could be observed at low temperature conditions in this study. The phase boundary was determined to be P (GPa) = (34.9 ± 1.2) + (0.0086 ± 0.0024) x (T – 1300) (K).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
M. A. Carpenter
Elastic properties of minerals and the influence of phase transitions
American Mineralogist, February 1, 2006; 91(2-3): 229 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
S. Ono, T. Suto, K. Hirose, Y. Kuwayama, T. Komabayashi, and T. Kikegawa
Equation of state of Al-bearing stishovite to 40 GPa at 300 K
American Mineralogist, October 1, 2002; 87(10): 1486 - 1489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America