|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |

1 Department of Geology, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon 97207, U.S.A.
2 Illinois State Geological Survey, 615 E. Peabody Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820, U.S.A.
Correspondence: * E-mail: grathoffg{at}pdx.edu
The Waukesha Illite is an excellent example of the illites found in argillaceous rocks, typical for Paleozoic shales that have undergone significant burial diagenesis during their geologic history. It consists of a mixture of detrital 2M1, interpreted to be a residuum of karstification within Silurian carbonates, and diagenetic 1M and 1Md illite. The chemistry and the age of the illite polytypes are different. Extrapolating to 100%, the 1M and 1Md polytypes have an apparent diagenetic age between 295 and 325 Ma. The chemistry of the 1M polytype could not be determined because of its low abundance. The approximate chemical composition of the 1Md polytype is 0.67 K, 3.6 Si, and 1.9 Al per half unit cell. The 2M1 polytype has an apparent detrital age between 440 and 520 Ma, and an approximate chemical composition per half unit cell of 0.78 K, 3.4 Si, and 2.1 Al, all within our margin of error.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) results of both random powder and oriented preparations both indicate that the Waukesha Illite consists of a mixture of illites. The XRD patterns of the random powder preparation indicate it is a physical mixture of three different illite polytypes. This result was confirmed using 3 different methods: (1) by measuring illite polytype-specific reflections; (2) by mixing illite polytype reference samples; and (3) by mixing WILDFIRE calculated XRD patterns. Decomposition of the illite 001 XRD peak from oriented preparations also indicates mixtures of illites. However, the proportions of the three illitic components derived from the oriented 001 peak decomposition differ from those results derived from the analysis of the random powder data. Therefore, the shape of the 001 reflection of the Waukesha Illite cannot be explained by mixing the three different illite polytypes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Franchini, A. Impiccini, L. Meinert, G. Grathoff, and I. B.A. Schalamuk Clay Mineralogy and Zonation in the Campana Mahuida Porphyry Cu Deposit, Neuquen, Argentina: Implications for Porphyry Cu Exploration Economic Geology, January 1, 2007; 102(1): 27 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. Elliott, A. Basu, J. M. Wampler, R. D. Elmore, and G. H. Grathoff COMPARISON OF K-Ar AGES OF DIAGENETIC ILLITE-SMECTITE TO THE AGE OF A CHEMICAL REMANENT MAGNETIZATION (CRM): AN EXAMPLE FROM THE ISLE OF SKYE, SCOTLAND Clays and Clay Minerals, June 1, 2006; 54(3): 314 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. ABAD, F. NIETO, G. GUTIERREZ-ALONSO, M. D. CAMPO, A. LOPEZ-MUNGUIRA, and N. VELILLA Illitic substitution in micas of very low-grade metamorphic clastic rocks European Journal of Mineralogy, February 1, 2006; 18(1): 59 - 69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |