Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist house ad
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; April 2002; v. 87; no. 4; p. 542-549
© 2002 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodehorst, U.
Right arrow Articles by Armbruster, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The crystal structures of grossular and spessartine between 100 and 600 K and the crystal chemistry of grossular-spessartine solid solutions

Uta Rodehorst1,*, Charles A. Geiger1 and Thomas Armbruster2

1 Institut für Geowissenschaften, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Olshausenstr. 40, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
2 Laboratorium für chemische und mineralogische Kristallographie, Universität Bern, Freiestrasse 3, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland

Spessartine (Mn3Al2Si3O12)-grossular (Ca3Al2Si3O12) solid solutions were synthesized at high pressures and temperatures. Compositionally homogeneous garnets are obtained by crystallizing solid-solution glasses prepared from oxides. The unit-cell parameter, a, for the different solid solutions was determined by X-ray powder diffraction methods and the results give positive deviations from ideal volumes of mixing that can be described with a symmetric mixing model with Wv = 0.80 (±0.04) cm3/mol. The degree of non-ideality is a function of the difference in size between the Ca2+ and Mn2+ cations and is consistent with the range of those observed for the other aluminosilicate garnet binary joins. The crystal structures of synthetic grossular and spessartine were collected at 50 K intervals between 103 K and 498/648 K using single-crystal X-ray diffraction methods. The rotation of the rigid SiO4 tetrahedra changes slightly by 0.3(1)° for grossular and 0.2(1)° for spessartine between 103 and 648 K. The volume expansions of the polyhedra were calculated and their distortions in grossular and spessartine were analyzed as a function of temperature. The linear thermal expansion coefficients of the Al-O and two X-O bond were also calculated for almandine, pyrope, grossular, and spessartine. The thermal expansion of spessartine is similar to that of grossular. In terms of polyhedral distortion and bond-valence values, spessartine has the most ideal structure of the aluminosilicate garnets. This could explain its large P-T stability field and the ease of synthesis at low pressures.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
C. A. Geiger
Silicate garnet: A micro to macroscopic (re)view
American Mineralogist, February 1, 2008; 93(2-3): 360 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
V. L. Vinograd and M. H.F. Sluiter
Thermodynamics of mixing in pyrope-grossular, Mg3Al2Si3O12-Ca3Al2Si3O12, solid solution from lattice dynamics calculations and Monte Carlo simulations
American Mineralogist, November 1, 2006; 91(11-12): 1815 - 1830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America