Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist GSW 2008 Users' Group Meeting
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; April 2002; v. 87; no. 4; p. 580-591
© 2002 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bilinski, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hanzel, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Characterization of Mn oxides in cemented streambed crusts from Pinal Creek, Arizona, U.S.A., and in hot-spring deposits from Yuno-Taki Falls, Hokkaido, Japan

Halka Bilinski1,*, Rudolf Giovanoli2, Akira Usui3 and Darko Hanzel4

1 Rudjer Bos kovic Institute, POB 180, HR-10001 Zagreb, Croatia
2 Laboratory of Electron Microscopy, Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Berne, 3 Freiestrasse, CH-3000 Berne 9, Switzerland
3 Marine Geology Department, Geological Survey of Japan, 1-1-3 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8567 Japan
4 J. Stefan Institute, University of Ljubljana, Jamova 39, P. O. B. 3000, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Correspondence: * E-mail: bilinski{at}rudjer.irb.hr

We report studies of recently precipitated terrestrial Mn oxides from Pinal Creek (Arizona, U.S.A.) and from Yuno-Taki Falls (Hokkaido, Japan). In addition to chemical analysis [by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and proton induced X-ray emission spectroscopy (PIXE)], the following methods were used: X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), contraction and expansion tests, thermogravimetry (TG), derivative thermogravimetry (DTG), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), infrared spectroscopy (IR), and Mössbauer spectroscopy. Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) was applied in a few cases, but only on synthetic samples. The most useful methods for characterizing the 10 Å Mn minerals were XRD, contraction test, and DSC. Mössbauer spectroscopy was a very useful complementary method to XRD for differentiation of the poorly crystalline Fe compounds. IR spectroscopy was found not to be very useful in distinguishing buserite and birnessite, but a distinct pattern was observed for todorokite. For heterogeneous deposits composed of many minerals, IR was not useful without separation of phases.

Three types of samples were identified from Yuno-Taki. One of them, representing a relatively fresh deposit exposed to water, was found to be a nearly ideal buserite with an XRD pattern similar to synthetic samples. An older, non-ideal buserite could be dehydrated but not expanded, suggesting that it had been slightly transformed. The third sample was from a deposit that was dry at the time of sampling. It is a 7 Å mineral (birnessite or takanelite/rancieite). The sample also contains amorphous Fe hydroxide, confirmed by Mössbauer spectroscopy.

A test of the possibility of buserite transformation showed that autoclaving a sample of the synthetic 10 Å phyllomanganate, Mg-buserite, resulted in a compound with the XRD pattern and IR spectrum of todorokite. We suggest that this pure synthetic product be used as a model compound for the high-temperature hydrothermal 10 Å manganate with tunnel structure, todorokite. Experiments at other conditions demonstrated that synthetic buserite collapses to birnessite during dehydration.

Pinal Creek crusts are composed of quartz, feldspar, Fe minerals (magnetite, maghemite, ilmenite, hematite), and Mn minerals. Resistance to dehydration and expansion tests, and the initial endotherm shown in DSC analysis, suggest that the 10 Å manganate is todorokite. A 7 Å mineral (birnessite or takanelite/rancieite) is also present. Based on comparison of XRD and electron microscopy data for the natural samples with tests done on the synthetic samples, we postulate that the birnessite or takanelite/rancieite and todorokite found in th Pinal Creek crusts may be a transformation products of a buserite precursor.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
M. Villalobos, B. Lanson, A. Manceau, B. Toner, and G. Sposito
Structural model for the biogenic Mn oxide produced by Pseudomonas putida
American Mineralogist, April 1, 2006; 91(4): 489 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America