Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist house ad
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; August 2002; v. 87; no. 8-9; p. 1190-1193
© 2002 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SchmÜcker, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Mechanism of 2/1- to 3/2-mullite transformation at 1650 °C

Martin SchmÜcker, Bernd Hildmann and Hartmut Schneider

Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Werkstoff-Forschung, D-51147 Cologne, Germany

Correspondence: * E-mail: Martin.Schmuecker{at}dlr.de

The transformation of 2/1-mullite single crystals into stable 3/2-mullite was investigated using reaction couples of 2/1-mullite cut parallel to (001) and silica glass at 1650 °C. A thin layer of 3/2-mullite formed at the surface of the parent 2/1-mullite crystal. Between 3/2- and 2/1-mullite a gradual transition layer of about 1 µm exists. This gradual transition zone and the lack of any interface between the substrate 2/1-mullite and the newly formed 3/2-mullite implies a topotactic transformation mechanism controlled by Al, Si, and O interdiffusion with preservation of the basic crystal structure, especially the AlO6 octahedral chains. The number of O atom vacancies is reduced going from 2/1- to 3/2-mullite, as shown by a gradual decrease of the corresponding superlattice intensities in electron diffraction patterns. As the transformation requires diffusion of Al out of and of Si and O atoms into the 2/1-mullite crystal, a coexisting silicate melt is required as an Al sink and as a source of Si and O atoms.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America