Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist house ad
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; November-December; v. 88; no. 11-12; p. 2040-2044
© 2003 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henriksen, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bown, P.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Letter

Tailoring calcite: Nanoscale AFM of coccolith biocrystals

K. Henriksen1, S.L.S. Stipp1,*, J.R. Young2 and P.R. Bown3

1 Geological Institute, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark
2 Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, U.K.
3 Department of Geology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, U.K.

Correspondence: * E-mail: stipp{at}geol.ku.dk

Biomineralization produces crystals of elaborate shapes, never seen in inorganic mineralogy, with tightly regulated compositions and axis orientations. The calcite coccoliths produced by unicellular marine algae provide an example of such control at very tiny scales. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) of two species provided nanoscale images allowing us to define crystallographic orientation in the crystal elements and to establish the relationship between crystallographic orientation and coccolith morphology. Both species adopt the inorganically stable calcite rhomb, but differences in crystal orientation enable them to construct distinct architectures with properties tailored to suit the requirements of their ecological niche.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Hassenkam, L. L. Skovbjerg, and S. L. S. Stipp
Probing the intrinsically oil-wet surfaces of pores in North Sea chalk at subpore resolution
PNAS, April 14, 2009; 106(15): 6071 - 6076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
K. Saruwatari, N. Ozaki, H. Nagasawa, and T. Kogure
Comparison of crystallographic orientations between living (Emiliania huxleyi and Gephyrocapsa oceanica) and fossil (Watznaueria barnesiae) coccoliths using electron microscopes
American Mineralogist, October 1, 2008; 93(10): 1670 - 1677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
K. Saruwatari, N. Ozaki, H. Nagasawa, and T. Kogure
Crystallographic alignments in a coccolith (Pleurochrysis carterae) revealed by electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD)
American Mineralogist, November 1, 2006; 91(11-12): 1937 - 1940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
B. Nguyen, R. M. Bowers, T. M. Wahlund, and B. A. Read
Suppressive Subtractive Hybridization of and Differences in Gene Expression Content of Calcifying and Noncalcifying Cultures of Emiliania huxleyi Strain 1516
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., May 1, 2005; 71(5): 2564 - 2575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
K. Henriksen, S.L.S. Stipp, J.R. Young, and M.E. Marsh
Biological control on calcite crystallization: AFM investigation of coccolith polysaccharide function
American Mineralogist, November 1, 2004; 89(11-12): 1709 - 1716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America