Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; May 2003; v. 88; no. 5-6; p. 855-859
© 2003 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (29)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Majzlan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Navrotsky, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Thermodynamics of Fe oxides: Part II. Enthalpies of formation and relative stability of goethite ({alpha}-FeOOH), lepidocrocite ({gamma}-FeOOH), and maghemite ({gamma}-Fe2O3)

Juraj Majzlan1,*, Klaus-Dieter Grevel1,2 and Alexandra Navrotsky1

1 Thermochemistry Facility and Department of Geology, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616, U.S.A.
2 Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Institut fur Geologie, Mineralogie und Geophysik, 44780 Bochum, Germany

The enthalpy of formation from the elements at 298.15 K ({Delta}H0f) of lepidocrocite ({gamma}-FeOOH) and maghemite ({gamma}-Fe2O3) has been measured by acid-solution calorimetry as –549.4 ± 1.4 and –808.1 ± 2.0 kJ/mol, respectively. The {Delta}Hf0 of goethite ({alpha}-FeOOH) was measured by high-temperature transposed temperature drop and acid-solution calorimetry as –559.5 ± 1.1 and –560.7 ± 1.2 kJ/mol, respectively.

Mathematical programming analysis (MAP) was used to generate an internally consistent data set for goethite and hematite, using the thermodynamic data presented in this study for goethite, and additional thermodynamic data for hematite and synthesis experiments of Baneyeva and Bendeliani (1973) (BB) and Voigt and Will (1981) (VW). Using BB brackets, the thermodynamic values for goethite were refined to {Delta}Hf0 = –561.9 kJ/mol and entropy at standard pressure and temperature (S0) = 59.2 J/K·mol; using VW brackets, we arrived at {Delta}Hf0 = –561.4 kJ/mol and S0 = 59.5 J/(K·mol). However, MAP failed to include the magnetic transition in goethite, and the derived data should be used with caution.

Combined with the entropies for the studied phases, the Gibbs free energies of formation from the elements at 298.15 K are –489.8 ± 1.2, –480.1 ± 1.4, and –727.9 ± 2.0 kJ/mol, for goethite, lepidocrocite, and maghemite, respectively. Only hematite ({alpha}-Fe2O3) and goethite have a stability field in the Fe2O3-H2O system at low to moderate pressures; maghemite and lepidocrocite are meta-stable at all pressures and temperatures. Goethite is 1.0 ± 1.4 kJ/mol metastable in {Delta}G with respect to hematite and liquid water, and 2.0 ± 1.4 kJ/mol metastable with respect to hematite and water vapor at 298 K and 50% relative humidity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
S. Ackermann, B. Lazic, T. Armbruster, S. Doyle, K.-D. Grevel, and J. Majzlan
Thermodynamic and crystallographic properties of kornelite [Fe2(SO4)3{middle dot}~7.75H2O] and paracoquimbite [Fe2(SO4)3{middle dot}9H2O]
American Mineralogist, November 1, 2009; 94(11-12): 1620 - 1628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clays and Clay MineralsHome page
K. B. Ayala-Luis, C. B. Koch, and H. C. B. Hansen
THE STANDARD GIBBS ENERGY OF FORMATION OF Fe(II)Fe(III) HYDROXIDE SULFATE GREEN RUST
Clays and Clay Minerals, December 1, 2008; 56(6): 633 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
A.E. Gleason, R. Jeanloz, and M. Kunz
Pressure-temperature stability studies of FeOOH using X-ray diffraction
American Mineralogist, November 1, 2008; 93(11-12): 1882 - 1885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clays and Clay MineralsHome page
J. Majzlan, C. B. Koch, and A. Navrotsky
THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF FEROXYHYTE ({delta}'-FeOOH)
Clays and Clay Minerals, October 1, 2008; 56(5): 526 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J MineralHome page
J. MAJZLAN, A. NAVROTSKY, R. B. McCLESKEY, and C. N. ALPERS
Thermodynamic properties and crystal structure refinement of ferricopiapite, coquimbite, rhomboclase, and Fe2(SO4)3(H2O)5
European Journal of Mineralogy, April 1, 2006; 18(2): 175 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Can MineralHome page
S. R. Walker, H. E. Jamieson, A. Lanzirotti, C. F. Andrade, and G. E.M. Hall
THE SPECIATION OF ARSENIC IN IRON OXIDES IN MINE WASTES FROM THE GIANT GOLD MINE, N.W.T.: APPLICATION OF SYNCHROTRON MICRO-XRD AND MICRO-XANES AT THE GRAIN SCALE
Can Mineral, August 1, 2005; 43(4): 1205 - 1224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clays and Clay MineralsHome page
L. Mazeina and A. Navrotsky
SURFACE ENTHALPY OF GOETHITE
Clays and Clay Minerals, April 1, 2005; 53(2): 113 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Navrotsky
Energetic clues to pathways to biomineralization: Precursors, clusters, and nanoparticles
PNAS, August 17, 2004; 101(33): 12096 - 12101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
J. Majzlan, J. Majzlan, B. E. Lang, R. Stevens, A. Navrotsky, B. F. Woodfield, and J. Boerio-Goates
Thermodynamics of Fe oxides: Part I. Entropy at standard temperature and pressure and heat capacity of goethite ({alpha}-FeOOH), lepidocrocite ({gamma}-FeOOH), and maghemite ({gamma}-Fe2O3)
American Mineralogist, May 1, 2003; 88(5-6): 846 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America