Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
American Mineralogist RIMG advertisement
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
American Mineralogist; August 2003; v. 88; no. 8-9; p. 1300-1311
© 2003 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brenker, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Brey, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Variation of antiphase domain size in omphacite: A tool to determine the temperature–time history of eclogites revisited

Frank E. Brenker1,*, Wolfgang Friedrich Müller2 and Gerhard P. Brey3

1 Institut für Mineralogie und Geochemie, Universität zu Köln, Zülpicher Str. 49b, 50674 Köln, Germany
2 Institut für Angewandte Geowissenschaften, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Schnittspahnstr.9, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
3 Institut für Mineralogie, J.W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Senckenberganlage 28, 60054 Frankfurt, Germany

Correspondence: * E-mail: brenker{at}min.uni-koeln.de

A systematic transmission electron microscopy (TEM) study was performed on the size distribution of antiphase domains in omphacite from eclogites from the Adula/Cima Lunga nappe. The measured mean antiphase domain size is shown to depend on peak temperature, duration of peak metamorphism, cooling rate, and composition. The systematics of the size distribution are modified by dislocation interaction, recrystallization, and the time of growth during the temperature-time-deformation history of the rock. Based on a new model for the size distribution of antiphase domains, we are able to show the potential and limits to estimating time and peak temperature of metamorphism and the subsequent cooling history of this important rock type.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur J MineralHome page
W. F. Muller, N. Walte, and N. Miyajima
Experimental deformation of ordered natural omphacite: a study by transmission electron microscopy
European Journal of Mineralogy, October 1, 2008; 20(5): 835 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Can MineralHome page
R. Bocchio, L. De Capitani, and L. Ottolini
NEW CHEMICAL DATA ON THE CLINOPYROXENE-GARNET PAIR IN THE ALPE ARAMI ECLOGITE, CENTRAL ALPS, SWITZERLAND
Can Mineral, August 1, 2004; 42(4): 1205 - 1219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur J MineralHome page
W. F. MULLER, F. E. BRENKER, E. B. BARNERT, and G. FRANZ
Chain multiplicity faults in deformed omphacite from eclogite
European Journal of Mineralogy, February 1, 2004; 16(1): 37 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by Mineralogical Society of America