|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, U.S.A.
2 Department of Geological Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York 13902, U.S.A.
3 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, U.S.A.
Correspondence: * E-mail:bozhilov{at}ucr.edu
The formation mechanisms of tremolite in a time series of hydrothermal experiments at 850 °C and 6.1 kbar were studied using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), analytical TEM, and X- ray diffraction. The starting materials were unseeded mixtures of reagent-grade oxides. After the first 8 min of reaction, the synthesis products were diopside, enstatite, clinoenstatite, quartz, and minor C -centered and primitive monoclinic amphibole (13 wt% total). The compositions of the first- formed amphiboles vary considerably, from essentially pure cummingtonite (Ca/Mg = 0) to nearly ideal tremolite (Ca/Mg = 0.4). Three groupings of amphiboles with successively higher Ca/Mg ratios were identified, respectively 0.1, 0.22, and 0.35. Over a period of 97 h, the proportions of Mg-rich amphibole gradually decrease, and the average Ca/Mg ratios of all amphiboles steadily increase from about 0.22 to 0.35. Other changes include:(1) a decrease in the aspect ratio of amphibole crystals with increasing time; (2) a decrease in the number of non-amphibole chain multiplicity faults (CMFs), from early A'(2) values as low as 0.81 to a final value of 0.94; and (3) a distinct change in the rate of amphibole growth after 1 h of synthesis. These observations suggest that two mechanisms of amphibole formation are dominant:(1) formation of pyroxene modules with subsequent hydration and arrangement into the double-chain amphibole structure and (2) direct nucleation and growth of amphibole from hydrothermal solution. A third mechanism involving formation of talc-like modules, followed by their breakdown into double-chain modules, incorporation of Ca, and ordering into the amphibole structure, may also occur but probably only at the lamellar or unit-cell scale, because these syntheses were performed outside the stability field of talc.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Bloise, E. Fornero, E. Belluso, E. Barrese, and C. Rinaudo Synthesis and characterization of tremolite asbestos fibres European Journal of Mineralogy, December 1, 2008; 20(6): 1027 - 1033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ishida, D. M. Jenkins, and F. C. Hawthorne Mid-IR bands of synthetic calcic amphiboles of tremolite-pargasite series and of natural calcic amphiboles American Mineralogist, July 1, 2008; 93(7): 1112 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. V. Maresch and M. Czank The Significance of the Reaction Path in Synthesizing Single-Phase Amphibole of Defined Composition Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, October 1, 2007; 67(1): 287 - 322. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. N. Bozhilov, D. Brownstein, and D. M. Jenkins Biopyribole evolution during tremolite synthesis from dolomite and quartz in CO2-H2O fluid American Mineralogist, May 1, 2007; 92(5-6): 898 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Driscall, D. M. Jenkins, M. D. Dyar, and K. N. Bozhilov Cation ordering in synthetic low-calcium actinolite American Mineralogist, May 1, 2005; 90(5-6): 900 - 911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |