Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; October 2004; v. 89; no. 10; p. 1486-1495
© 2004 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moecher, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Brearley, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Mineralogy and petrology of a mullite-bearing pseudotachylyte: Constraints on the temperature of coseismic frictional fusion

David P. Moecher1,* and Adrian J. Brearley2

1 University of Kentucky, Department of Geological Sciences, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, U.S.A.
2 University of New Mexico, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: moker{at}uky.edu

Pseudotachylyte from the Homestake Shear Zone, central Colorado, contains acicular, 5–10 x 100 µm mullite crystals, 1–5 µm octahedra of magnetite, and variably melted clasts of quartz in an originally molten matrix. Several lines of evidence support the interpretation that the pseudotachylyte represents the quenched equivalent of a molten phase derived from preferential melting of primarily biotite, microcline and plagioclase, and to a lesser extent quartz, from the gneissic protolith: the morphology of the mullite crystals, which nucleate on and radiate from relic sillimanite clasts; abundant magnetite octahedra scattered throughout the pseudotachylyte matrix and intergrown with mullite, forming plumose quench structures; partially melted relict quartz clasts; the composition of the isotropic pseudotachylyte matrix; and chemical gradients surrounding quartz clasts in pseudotachylyte matrix. Although the sample had been nearly completely molten (except for 10–100 µm relict quartz clasts), HRTEM imaging of the pseudotachylyte matrix reveals that it has devitrified. The slightly birefringent matrix consists of intergrowths of submicrometer flakes of white mica. Microprobe analysis shows that the mullite is highly enriched in Fe (8–10 wt% Fe2O3) compared with other natural mullites. HRTEM and SEM images reveal the presence of oriented platelets of an Fe-oxide phase, dominantly hematite that appears to have exsolved from the mullite during cooling, indicating that the limit of solid solution of Fe3+ in mullite decreases with temperature. The estimated melt temperature ranges from 1150 to 1200 °C; this interpretation is based on the Fe2O3 content of mullite, the liquidus temperature for melts corresponding to the matrix compositions, and liquidus temperatures for gneissic wall rocks, which underwent complete to very high degrees of melting.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America