Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; November 2004; v. 89; no. 11-12; p. 1581-1585
© 2004 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sato, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yamagishi, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

First-principle study of polytype structures of 1:1 dioctahedral phyllosilicates

Hisako Sato1,3, Kanta Ono2,3, Cliff T. Johnston4 and Akihiko Yamagishi1,3,*

1 Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
2 Institute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan
3 CREST, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan
4 Birck Nanotechnology Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: yamagisi{at}eps.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp

The polytype structures of the three 1:1 dioctahedral phyllosilicates found in nature, kaolinite, dickite, and nacrite, have been investigated, using first-principle calculations within density functional theory. The crystal structures were calculated by being optimized with relaxation of all atomic positions. The calculated structural parameters, including the orientation of the OH groups, for the three polytypes are in good agreement with experimental data. In particular, for kaolinite and dickite, the three-inner surface OH groups were predicted to be oriented nearly perpendicular to the (001) plane. In contrast, one of the inner surface OH groups of nacrite was predicted to be nearly parallel with respect to the (001) plane. Based on a comparison of formation energies, the chiral polymorphs of kaolinite (B- or C-site vacancy) have similar formation energies as dickite and nacrite, while achiral kaolinite with A-site vacancy is only slightly less stable than the other polytypes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clays and Clay MineralsHome page
C. T. Johnston, J. E. Kogel, D. L. Bish, T. Kogure, and H. H. Murray
LOW-TEMPERATURE FTIR STUDY OF KAOLIN-GROUP MINERALS
Clays and Clay Minerals, August 1, 2008; 56(4): 470 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
H. Sato, K. Ono, C. T. Johnston, and A. Yamagishi
First-principles studies on the elastic constants of a 1:1 layered kaolinite mineral
American Mineralogist, November 1, 2005; 90(11-12): 1824 - 1826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America