Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; November 2004; v. 89; no. 11-12; p. 1631-1639
© 2004 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dódony, I.
Right arrow Articles by Buseck, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Lizardite-chlorite structural relationships and an inferred high-pressure lizardite polytype

István Dódony1,2,* and Peter R. Buseck1

1 Departments of Geological Sciences and Chemistry/Biochemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287, U.S.A.
2 Department of Mineralogy, Eötvös L. University, Budapest, H-1117, Pázmány sétány 1C, Hungary

Correspondence: * E-mail: idodony{at}asu.edu

We determined details of the layer stackings in lizardite (variety: baltimorite) and chlorite in a splintery sample from a massive serpentinite. Based on high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and image simulations, we localized the positions of projected columns of tetrahedral (T) and octahedral (O) cations that allow determination of the nature of the transformation of lizardite to chlorite and the structural formula of the chlorite. The lizardite stacking is of an unexpected type because adjacent layers are in non-hydrogen-bonded placements, a configuration that permits easy, strain-free transformation to chlorite. We conclude that the lizardite-chlorite transformation was isochemical and at constant volume. A consequence is that the product chlorite consists of neutral brucite- and talc-type layers and so can be regarded as a 1:1 interstratification of brucite and talc. Both the T and the O sheets in talc-type layers contain M3+ (M = Al, Fe, Cr, ...) cations. An implication of our results combined with high-pressure studies of chlorite and TO silicates is that lizardite stacking sequences can indicate whether a given crystal has been subjected to high pressures. Lizardite in non-hydrogen-bonded sequences presumably has this configuration because of its prior exposure to elevated pressures and can thus be added to the list of indicators of past high pressure. Calibration of this new geobarometer remains for the future.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
T. Mizukami, H. Kagi, S. R. Wallis, and S. Fukura
Pressure-induced change in the compressional behavior of the O-H bond in chrysotile: A Raman high-pressure study up to 4.5 GPa
American Mineralogist, August 1, 2007; 92(8-9): 1456 - 1463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
D. P. Dobson, A. A. De Ronde, M. D. Welch, and P. G. Meredith
The acoustic emissions signature of a pressure-induced polytypic transformation in chlorite
American Mineralogist, February 1, 2007; 92(2-3): 437 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
I. Dodony, M. Posfai, and P. R. Buseck
Does antigorite really contain 4- and 8-membered rings of tetrahedra?
American Mineralogist, November 1, 2006; 91(11-12): 1831 - 1838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America