Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist house ad
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; November 2004; v. 89; no. 11-12; p. 1763-1771
© 2004 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andreozzi, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Russo, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Site distribution of Fe2+ and Fe3+ in the axinite mineral group: New crystal-chemical formula

Giovanni B. Andreozzi1,*, Sergio Lucchesi1, Giorgio Graziani1 and Umberto Russo2

1 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Roma "La Sapienza", Piazzale Aldo, Moro 5, I-00185 Roma, Italy
2 Dipartimento di Chimica Inorganica, Metallorganica e Analitica, Università di Padova, Via Loredan 4, I-35131 Padova, Italy

Correspondence: * E-Mail: gianni.andreozzi{at}uniroma1.it

A set of nine samples of axinite, selected from 60 specimens from worldwide localities, were investigated by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, electron and ion microprobe, and 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy. The selected samples cover the compositional join from almost pure ferroaxinite (80%) to pure manganaxinite (95%). A new crystal-chemical formula for the axinite mineral group is proposed: VI[X1 X2 Y Z1 Z2]2IV[T1 T2 T3 T4 T5]2O30(OwOH1–w)2, where VI and IV are coordination numbers; X1 = Ca and very minor Na; X2 = Ca (in axinites) or Mn (in tinzenite); Y = Mn (in manganaxinite and tinzenite), Fe2+ (in ferroaxinite) or Mg (in magnesioaxinite), with minor Al and Fe3+; Z1 = Al and Fe3+; Z2 = Al; T1, T2, and T3 = Si; T4 = Si (and presumably very minor B); T5 = B and minor Si. Charge unbalance (w), due to heterovalent substitutions, is compensated for by O2– -> OH substitution.

From ferroaxinite to manganaxinite, cell volume increases linearly from 568.70 to 573.60 Å3. This is mainly due to an increase in the <Y-O> mean distance from 2.220 to 2.255 Å, which is directly related to the Mn population (up to 1.89 apfu). Fe3+ concentrations, as determined by 57Fe Mössbauer spectra at 80 K, sub-regularly increase up to 0.27 apfu, and three cases are evidenced: (1) Fe3+ << Fe2+ (or no Fe3+), in ferroaxinite; (2) Fe3+ < Fe2+, in intermediate compositions, and (3) Fe3+ > Fe2+ (or only Fe3+), in manganaxinite.

Chemical and structural data were co-processed via a computer minimization program to obtain the cation distribution scheme. Adopting the Hard-Sphere Model, empirical cation-oxygen distances were refined for every cation in the axinite structure. The results revealed that Fe2+ is ordered at the octahedral Y site (up to 1.61 apfu), whereas Fe3+ is ordered at the octahedral Z1 site (up to 0.26 apfu) and is almost absent in the smallest Z2 site, which is fully populated by Al. The observed Fe3+ partitioning is in agreement with the structural results, which show that the Z1 octahedron is always larger than Z2. Moreover, no Fe3+ is found at the tetrahedral sites, but Si -> B substitution occurs at T5. The continuous Y dimensional increase from ferroaxinite to manganaxinite involves progressive enlargement of the edge-sharing Z1 octahedron. As a consequence, the Z1Fe3+ -> Z1Al3+ substitution is structurally favored toward manganaxinite and points to a new end-member with the suggested name "ferri-manganaxinite."




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
J. Filip, E. Dachs, J. Tucek, M. Novak, and P. Bezdicka
Low-temperature calorimetric and magnetic data for natural end-members of the axinite group
American Mineralogist, April 1, 2008; 93(4): 548 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
G. B. Andreozzi, F. Bosi, and M. Longo
Linking Mossbauer and structural parameters in elbaite-schorl-dravite tourmalines
American Mineralogist, April 1, 2008; 93(4): 658 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Can MineralHome page
A. Gianfagna, G. B. Andreozzi, P. Ballirano, S. Mazziotti-Tagliani, and B. M. Bruni
STRUCTURAL AND CHEMICAL CONTRASTS BETWEEN PRISMATIC AND FIBROUS FLUORO-EDENITE FROM BIANCAVILLA, SICILY, ITALY
Can Mineral, April 1, 2007; 45(2): 249 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Can MineralHome page
J. Filip, J. Filip, U. Kolitsch, M. Novak, and O. Schneeweiss
THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF NEAR-END-MEMBER FERROAXINITE FROM AN IRON-CONTAMINATED PEGMATITE AT MALESOV, CZECH REPUBLIC
Can Mineral, October 1, 2006; 44(5): 1159 - 1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America