Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; February 2004; v. 89; no. 2-3; p. 371-376
© 2004 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diella, V.
Right arrow Articles by Pavese, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

High-pressure synchrotron X-ray diffraction study of spessartine and uvarovite: A comparison between different equation of state models

Valeria Diella1,*, Alessandra Sani2, Davide Levy3 and Alessandro Pavese1,4

1 CNR Istituto per la Dinamica dei Processi Ambientali, Via Botticelli 23, 20133 Milano, Italy
2 European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, 38043 Grenoble Cedex, France
3 Dipartimento di Scienze Mineralogiche e Petrologiche, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Valperga Caluso 37, 10125 Torino, Italy
4 Dipartimento Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Botticelli 23, 20133 Milano, Italy

Correspondence: * E-mail:valeria.diella{at}idpa.cnr.it

The lattice parameters of natural spessartine and uvarovite garnets were measured as a function of pressure up to 25 and 35 GPa, respectively, by synchrotron radiation powder diffraction. The bulk modulus and its first and second derivatives were determined by fitting three equation of state (EoS) models to the pressure-volume data: the Birch-Murnaghan EoS, the Vinet EoS, and the Poirier- Tarantola logarithmic EoS. The third-order Birch-Murnaghan EoS, assuming V0 at its experimental value, yields K0 = 171 (1)GPa and K0' = 5.4 (2) with V0 = 1573 Å3 for spessartine, and K0 = 160(1) GPa and K0' = 5.8(1) with V0 = 1697.5 Å3 for uvarovite. The results obtained by the EoS models are consistent with each other within the experimental uncertainties. A comparison is made with earlier results from the literature.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America