Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist RIMG advertisement
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; April 2004; v. 89; no. 4; p. 498-504
© 2004 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hervig, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

SIMS microanalyses for Au in silicates

Richard L. Hervig1,2,*, Frank K. Mazdab1, Lisa Danielson2, Thomas G. Sharp1,2, A. Hamed3 and Peter Williams3

1 Center for Solid State Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, U.S.A.
2 Department of Geological Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, U.S.A.
3 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: Richard.Hervig{at}asu.edu

Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) analyses of silicates show high sensitivity for Au when an alkali metal primary beam is used in conjunction with detection of negative secondary ions and an electron flood gun for charge neutralization. Two approaches to analysis give good results: (1) Cs primary ions and high mass resolution analysis of secondary ions, and (2) K primary ions and energy filtering (50 ± 20 eV) of the secondary ions. The latter technique shows slightly higher sensitivity but requires modification of off-the-shelf SIMS instruments whereas the former technique is accessible to most magnetic sector SIMS as delivered. Study of National Institute of Standards and Technology glasses indicates detection levels below 100 ppb by weight (~10 ppb atomic).







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America