Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (15) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Herd, C. D. K. Articles by Shearer, C. K. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

The behavior of Li and B during planetary basalt crystallization

¹ Lunar and Planetary Institute, 3600 Bay Area Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77058, U.S.A.
² Astromaterials Research Office, SR, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas 77058, U.S.A.
³ Institute of Meteoritics, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, U.S.A.

Correspondence: ^* E-mail: herd{at}ualberta.ca

Light-lithophile-element zoning patterns in pyroxene in the Shergotty and Zagami martian basaltic meteorites have previously been presented as evidence for pre-eruptive martian water. We investigate the partitioning of Li and B in martian igneous minerals experimentally, using a composition approximating that of the Queen Alexandria Range (QUE) 94201 martian basalt in one-atmosphere gas-mixing furnaces. Partition coefficients obtained for pyroxene(D_Li = 0.2, D_B = 0.023), plagioclase (D_Li = 0.37, D_B = 0.024), olivine (D_Li = 0.27, D_B = 0.007) and merrillite (D_Li = 0.7, D_B = 0.03), measured using Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry of experimental charges, demonstrate that Li and B are incompatible in these minerals. As a test of our experimentally determined, anhydrous partition coefficients, we analyzed pyroxene in the Pasamonte eucrite, an asteroidal basalt with an anhydrous petrogenesis. Coupling of the partition coefficients with Pasamonte pyroxene analyses gives B parental melt concentrations in relative agreement with bulk rock analyses; however, Li parental melt concentrations and bulk analyses do not agree, suggestive of post-crystallization modification of Li zoning trends. Our results demonstrate that Li and B zoning patterns in pyroxene in martian basalts cannot be explained by the uptake of Li and B by co-crystallizing plagioclase, olivine, or merrillite, and suggest that the petrogeneses of Shergotty and Zagami involved something other than simple, one-atmosphere, anhydrous crystallization.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Chaklader, C.K. Shearer, and L.E. Borg The behavior of Li and B in lunar mare basalts during crystallization, shock, and thermal metamorphism: Implications for volatile element contents of martian basalts American Mineralogist, October 1, 2006; 91(10): 1553 - 1564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]