Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; August 2004; v. 89; no. 8-9; p. 1192-1201
© 2004 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Circone, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kirby, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The effect of elevated methane pressure on methane hydrate dissociation

Susan Circone*, Laura A. Stern and Stephen H. Kirby

U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road MS 977, Menlo Park, California 94025, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: scircone{at}usgs.gov

Methane hydrate, equilibrated at P, T conditions within the hydrate stability field, was rapidly depressurized to 1.0 or 2.0 MPa and maintained at isobaric conditions outside its stability field, while the extent and rate of hydrate dissociation was measured at fixed, externally maintained temperatures between 250 and 288 K. The dissociation rate decreases with increasing pressure at a given temperature. Dissociation rates at 1.0 MPa parallel the complex, reproducible T-dependence previously observed between 250 and 272 K at 0.1 MPa. The lowest rates were observed near 268 K, such that >50% of the sample can persist for more than two weeks at 0.1 MPa to more than a month at 1 and 2 MPa. Varying the pressure stepwise in a single experiment increased or decreased the dissociation rate in proportion to the rates observed in the isobaric experiments, similar to the rate reversibility previously observed with stepwise changes in temperature at 0.1 MPa.

At fixed P, T conditions, the rate of methane hydrate dissociation decreases monotonically with time, never achieving a steady rate. The relationship between time (t) and the extent of hydrate dissociation is empirically described by:

Evolved gas (%) = A·tB      (1)

where the pre-exponential term A ranges from 0 to 16% sB and the exponent B is generally <1. Based on fits of the dissociation results to Equation 1 for the full range of temperatures (204 to 289 K) and pressures (0.1 to 2.0 MPa) investigated, the derived parameters can be used to predict the methane evolution curves for pure, porous methane hydrate to within ±5%. The effects of sample porosity and the presence of quartz sand and seawater on methane hydrate dissociation are also described using Equation 1.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
H. Hirai, S.-i. Machida, T. Kawamura, Y. Yamamoto, and T. Yagi
Stabilizing of methane hydrate and transition to a new high-pressure structure at 40 GPa
American Mineralogist, May 1, 2006; 91(5-6): 826 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
L. A. Stern, L. A. Stern, S. H. Kirby, S. Circone, and W. B. Durham
Scanning Electron Microscopy investigations of laboratory-grown gas clathrate hydrates formed from melting ice, and comparison to natural hydrates
American Mineralogist, August 1, 2004; 89(8-9): 1162 - 1175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America