Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; October 2005; v. 90; no. 10; p. 1500-1505; DOI: 10.2138/am.2005.1797
© 2005 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antao, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Parise, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Effects of high pressure and high temperature on cation ordering in magnesioferrite, MgFe2O4, using in situ synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction up to 1430 K and 6 GPa

Sytle M. Antao1,*, Ishmael Hassan2, Wilson A. Crichton3 and John B. Parise1

1 Mineral Physics Institute and Department of Geosciences, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794-2100, U.S.A.
2 Department of Chemistry, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica
3 European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, BP 220, F 38043 Grenoble, France

Correspondence: * E-mail sytle.antao{at}stonybrook.edu

Disorder in stoichiometric magnesioferrite, MgFe2O4, was determined from in situ synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction data [{lambda} = 0.3738(4) Å] at 6, 5, and 3 GPa and temperatures up to 1430 K. The a unit-cell parameter increases linearly on heating at the three different pressures. Higher pressures cause a smaller cell volume, as expected. Cation order was analyzed in terms of the inversion parameter, x, {iv[Mg1–xFex]vi[Mgx/2Fe1–x/2]2O4} and the order parameter Q = 1 – (3/2)x. As pressure increases, the inversion parameter increases in inverse MgFe2O4 spinel. O’Neill and Navrotsky (1983) and Landau models were used to describe the equilibrium non-convergent ordering process in MgFe2O4, and they both fit the data well.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America