Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ohfuji, H. Articles by Rickard, D. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Structure of framboidal pyrite: An electron backscatter diffraction study

¹ School of Earth, Ocean, and Planetary Sciences, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3YE, U.K.
² Department of Earth Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GP, U.K.

The detailed crystallography of natural pyrite framboids has been determined for the first time using electron backscatter diffraction techniques. The crystallographic ordering of microcrystals correlates positively with morphological ordering; the crystallographic orientations are random in morphologically disordered framboids and are almost ordered in morphologically ordered framboids. Morphologically ordered framboids involve two types of systematic misorientations across the microcrystal boundaries: low-angle (ca. <20°) and high-angle (ca. 70–90°) misorientations. The low-angle misorientation probably reflects slight physical misalignment of microcrystals in the packing structure, whereas the high-angle misorientation is considered to result from the dichotomy of the pyrite microcrystals having fourfold morphological symmetry but only twofold crystallographic symmetry about <100>. Thus, the crystallographic orientation of microcrystals is not uniform, even in highly ordered framboids. This suggests that the self-organization of microcrystals in pyrite framboids is not crystallographically controlled, for example by sequential replication of existing microcrystals, since this would not result in high lattice misorientation angles between adjacent microcrystals. Presumably, the self-organization process is a consequence of the aggregation of multiple equidimensional and equimorphic microcrystals that have nucleated in a fixed volume. We suggest that the regular arrangement of microcrystals occurs by the physical rotation (reorientation) of individual microcrystals, driven by the reduction in surface free energy between neighbors.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. OHFUJI, D. RICKARD, M. E. LIGHT, and M. B. HURSTHOUSE Structure of framboidal pyrite: a single crystal X-ray diffraction study European Journal of Mineralogy, February 1, 2006; 18(1): 93 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Posfai and R. E. Dunin-Borkowski Sulfides in Biosystems Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 61(1): 679 - 714. [Full Text] [PDF]