Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; April 2005; v. 90; no. 4; p. 737-744; DOI: 10.2138/am.2005.1483
© 2005 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tinkham, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ghent, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

XRMapAnal: A program for analysis of quantitative X-ray maps

Douglas K. Tinkham* and Edward D. Ghent

Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada

Correspondence: * E-mail: tinkham{at}ucalgary.ca

Software for processing quantitative X-ray maps collected on an electron probe microanalyzer is described. The techniques used in collection of maps and capabilities of the software to produce data useful for petrologic analysis are illustrated using three examples from pelitic schists from Mica Creek, British Columbia. The program utilizes a Bence-Albee algorithm to convert raw X-ray counts at each map pixel to wt% oxide, and allows for spectrometer deadtime corrections and background subtraction. Additional features include phase identification, modal analysis, calculation of cations, calculation of integrated rock composition over specified regions of the map, display of maps and compositional graphs, output of compositional statistics, and the ability to remove pixels and screen for bad analyses.

The first example utilizes a sample lacking phases with significant chemical zonation, and outlines the basic functionality of the program. The second example compares an integrated map composition to an X-ray fluorescence analysis on the same rock chip. The results indicate it is possible to obtain integrated map compositions approaching that obtained from an X-ray fluorescence analysis. The third example compares mean X-ray map compositions for individual phases to means obtained using routine point analysis procedures, and the results indicate mean phase compositions obtained from the X-ray maps are of generally high quality. The sample in this example contains compositionally zoned garnet, and is used to show the ability to remove selective portions of garnet to model the approximate change in effective bulk composition during garnet growth.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
A. K. Maloy and A. H. Treiman
Evaluation of image classification routines for determining modal mineralogy of rocks from X-ray maps
American Mineralogist, November 1, 2007; 92(11-12): 1781 - 1788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
D.E. Kelsey, M. Hand, C. Clark, and C.J.L. Wilson
On the application of in situ monazite chemical geochronology to constraining P-T-t histories in high-temperature (>850 {degrees}C) polymetamorphic granulites from Prydz Bay, East Antarctica
Journal of the Geological Society, May 1, 2007; 164(3): 667 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America