|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Via Laterina 8, 53100 Siena, Italy
Correspondence: * E-mail: gcapitani{at}unisi.it
Structural imaging of the "odd" m = 17 antigorite polysome is in keeping with the X-ray structure refinement, supplying direct evidence for the presence of 8-reversals. HRTEM also displays the polysomatic and stacking disorder features modeled during X-ray refinement to achieve convergence.
Polysomatic faults occur in Mg159 antigorite as (100) lamellae, with wavelength differing from the matrix by only one serpentine module (m = 16 or 18 vs. 17). Mixed ordered polysomes may also occur, such as a regular alternation of m = 16 and m = 17 lamellae, producing a complex polysome with an a repeat distance of 84.5 Å.
"Odd" and "even" antigorite polysomes differ in layer topology. "Odd" polysomes (m
2n, with n = integer) have a primitive cell with Pm space group, m tetrahedral and m-1 octahedral modules, and one 6-reversal and one 8-reversal per unit cell. Polysomes with m = 2n have C-centered cells (C2/m), m tetrahedral and m-2 octahedral modules, and two 6-reversals and two 8-reversals per cell.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. C. Capitani and M. Mellini Rationale for the existence of four- and eight-reversals in antigorite American Mineralogist, May 1, 2008; 93(5-6): 796 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Capitani and M. Mellini High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) investigation of antigorite polysomes (m = 15 to 18) American Mineralogist, January 1, 2007; 92(1): 64 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Dodony, M. Posfai, and P. R. Buseck Does antigorite really contain 4- and 8-membered rings of tetrahedra? American Mineralogist, November 1, 2006; 91(11-12): 1831 - 1838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Capitani and M. Mellini The crystal structure of a second antigorite polysome (m = 16), by single-crystal synchrotron diffraction American Mineralogist, February 1, 2006; 91(2-3): 394 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |