Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; August 2005; v. 90; no. 8-9; p. 1256-1264; DOI: 10.2138/am.2005.1517
© 2005 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ding, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Prewitt, C. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) study of the 4a and 6a superstructure of bornite Cu5FeS4

Yang Ding1,*, David R. Veblen1 and Charles T. Prewitt2

1 The Morton K Blaustein Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, U.S.A.
2 Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5251 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington, D.C. 20015, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: yding{at}hpcat.aps.anl.gov

The crystal structure and microstructure of bornite have been of great interest to mineralogists since the pioneering studies of Morimoto and his colleagues (Morimoto 1964; Koto and Morimoto 1975). Because many questions about bornite remain, we are re-examining its structure using HRTEM. High-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) images taken along the <101> axis of bornite and processed by CRISP show variations of contrast between superstructure images and sublattice (1a) images. This contrast variation in the processed images is assumed to arise from vacancy ordering. Atom coordinates in the 4a-I and 6a-I superstructures are determined with the assumptions that superstructures possess the same symmetry as the sublattice and metal atoms occupy tetrahedral sites. Final structural models of 4a-I and 6a-I superstructures are calculated using simultaneous equations involving structure factors derived from Fourier transforms (FT) of HRTEM images, and the results are confirmed by image and diffraction simulations. With these models, the non-systematic extinctions are explained by the statistical vacancy ordering patterns. However, due to various approximations, the structures proposed are only possible models, but not unique solutions. So far, no low-temperature structure of bornite (2a4a2a) has been observed, but 1a, 2a, and 4a-I or 6a-I superstructure domains are always found to coexist in bornite near room temperature. We have also found that electron beam damage can induce the 1a2a1a superstructure.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
E. Makovicky
Crystal Structures of Sulfides and Other Chalcogenides
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 61(1): 7 - 125.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America