Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist house ad
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; August 2005; v. 90; no. 8-9; p. 1265-1269; DOI: 10.2138/am.2005.1518
© 2005 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ding, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Prewitt, C. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Possible Fe/Cu ordering schemes in the 2a superstructure of bornite (Cu5FeS4)

Yang Ding1,*, David R. Veblen1 and Charles T. Prewitt2

1 The Morton K. Blaustein Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, U.S.A.
2 Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5251 Broad Branch Road, NW, Washington, D.C. 20015, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: yding{at}hpcat.aps.anl.gov

Based on magnetic structure and TEM studies of bornite we propose a new 2a Fe/Cu ordered superstructure model with symmetry F3m and formula Cu8Fe4S8. First principles calculations (LAPW implemented in WIEN97 code) of two Fe/Cu ordering schemes indicate that, at the ground state, the Fe atoms should fill the tetrahedral sites of sulfur atoms in the anti-fluorite cube, and the vacancies are associated with Cu atoms in the zincblende cube of the superstructure. The calculated magnetic moment of iron in the Fe/Cu-ordered structure is about 4 µß which was not expected from previous work because bornite has both covalent and metallic bonds that make crystal-field theory inappropriate for explaining the magnetic moment of Fe. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) image simulations for the newly proposed structure model are much closer to experimental HRTEM images than those for the model proposed by Kanazawa et al. (1978).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
E. Makovicky
Crystal Structures of Sulfides and Other Chalcogenides
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 61(1): 7 - 125.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
R. O. Sack and D. S. Ebel
Thermochemistry of Sulfide Mineral Solutions
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 61(1): 265 - 364.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America