Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist house ad
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; October 2006; v. 91; no. 10; p. 1547-1552; DOI: 10.2138/am.2006.2021
© 2006 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data Info
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gunter, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The atomic arrangement of merrillite from the Fra Mauro Formation, Apollo 14 lunar mission: The first structure of merrillite from the Moon

John M. Hughes1,*, Bradley L. Jolliff2 and Mickey E. Gunter3

1 Department of Geology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, U.S.A.
2 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences and the McDonnell Center for Space Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, U.S.A.
3 Department of Geological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-3022, U.S.A.

The atomic arrangement of lunar merrillite has been refined to R = 0.0452 in R3c using X-ray diffraction data recorded on a CCD detector; previous attempts at structure solution using a point detector were not successful because of the poorly crystallized nature of the lunar material. The atomic arrangement of merrillite has a structural unit of [(Mg,Fe)(PO4)6] 16–2 that forms a "bracelet-and-pinwheel" unit that is common in hexagonal-closest-packed layers. The individual structural units are not polymerized and exist in layers at z = 1/6, 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, and 5/6. In lunar merrillite, the [(Mg,Fe)(PO4)6]16–2 structural units are linked by a [(Ca,REE)18Na2(PO4)2]32+ interstitial complex, formed of Ca1O8, Ca2O8, Ca3O8, NaO6, and P1O4 polyhedra.

There has long been speculation regarding the relationship between merrillite and terrestrial whit-lockite, and the solution of the Fra Mauro merrillite atomic arrangement allows the characterization of the lunar phase. Lunar merrillite and terrestrial whitlockite have largely similar atomic arrangements, but the phases differ due to the presence or absence of hydrogen. In whitlockite, H is an essential element and allows the charge balance. Hydrogen is incorporated into the whitlockite atomic arrangement by disordering one of the phosphate tetrahedra and forming a PO3(OH) group. Lunar merrillite is devoid of hydrogen, and thus no disordered tetrahedral groups exist. Charge balance for substituents Y and REE (for Ca) is maintained by Si {leftrightarrow} P tetrahedral substitution and {square} {leftrightarrow} Na at the Na site. The structure solution demonstrates the effectiveness of the CCD detector in unraveling previously intractable diffraction data and urges that previously analyzed lunar material be reexamined using this instrumentation.

Key Words: Merrillite • Moon • atomic arrangement • chemistry




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
J. M. Hughes, B. L. Jolliff, and J. Rakovan
The crystal chemistry of whitlockite and merrillite and the dehydrogenation of whitlockite to merrillite
American Mineralogist, August 1, 2008; 93(8-9): 1300 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
G. E. Lofgren, G. R. Huss, and G.J. Wasserburg
An experimental study of trace-element partitioning between Ti-Al-clinopyroxene and melt: Equilibrium and kinetic effects including sector zoning
American Mineralogist, October 1, 2006; 91(10): 1596 - 1606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America