Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist house ad
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; November 2006; v. 91; no. 11-12; p. 1783-1793; DOI: 10.2138/am.2006.2075
© 2006 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dalby, K. N.
Right arrow Articles by King, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A new approach to determine and quantify structural units in silicate glasses using micro-reflectance Fourier-Transform infrared spectroscopy

Kim N. Dalby* and Penelope L. King

Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada

Correspondence: * E-mail: kdalby{at}uwo.ca

Eight silicate unit vibrational modes were identified in a suite of PbO-SiO2 glasses using micro-reflectance Fourier Transform infrared (µR-FTIR) spectra that were transformed using the Kramers-Kronig relation. The transformed FTIR spectra, in the 800–1200 cm–1 range, were deconvolved systematically into eight Voigt-shaped bands at centers that were predicted from the second derivative of the spectra. The area of the eight bands varied as a function of SiO2 content, and these trends were combined with theoretical constraints to identify and assign the bands to seven provisional silicate units: SiO4–4 (830 and 860 cm–1), Si2O6–7 (900 cm–1), Si6O12–18 (950 cm–1), Si2O4–6 (980 cm–1), Si4O6–11 (1010 cm–1), Si2O2–5 (1050 cm–1), and SiO2 (1100 cm–1). The provisional units were then grouped according to their NBO/T values: NBO/T = 4 (SiO4–4), NBO/T = 3 (Si2O6–7 ), NBO/T = 2 (Si6O12–18 and Si2O4–6 ), NBO/T = 1 (Si4O6–11 and Si2O2–5 ) and NBO/T = 0 (SiO2). The derived quantities of each NBO/T unit compare favorably with nuclear magnetic resonance data for PbO-SiO2 glasses reported in the literature. This new approach for determining glass structure is advantageous because it may be performed on small Fe-bearing samples with minimal preparation, and analyses are rapid and relatively inexpensive.

Key Words: IR spectroscopy • glass structure • band fitting • PbO-SiO2




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
C. D.M. Dufresne, P. L. King, M. D. Dyar, and K. N. Dalby
Effect of SiO2, total FeO, Fe3+/Fe2+, and alkali elements in basaltic glasses on mid-infrared spectra
American Mineralogist, November 1, 2009; 94(11-12): 1580 - 1590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America