Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; November 2006; v. 91; no. 11-12; p. 1937-1940; DOI: 10.2138/am.2006.2391
© 2006 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saruwatari, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kogure, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Letter

Crystallographic alignments in a coccolith (Pleurochrysis carterae) revealed by electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD)

Kazuko Saruwatari1,*, Noriaki Ozaki1, Hiromichi Nagasawa2 and Toshihiro Kogure1

1 Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
2 Department of Applied Biological Chemistry, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Yayoi 1-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan

Correspondence: * E-mail: kazuko{at}eps.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Crystal orientations of the sub-micrometer-sized calcite units in oval-shaped coccoliths of a coccolithophore, Pleurochrysis carterae, have been investigated using electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD). Although the contrast of the acquired EBSD patterns was weak due to the small crystal unit size, the orientations could be uniquely determined from the patterns. The crystal orientations for V- and R-units are close to those reported in a previous work using electron diffraction in a TEM. However, more accurate crystal orientations corresponding to the coccolith morphology were obtained by using EBSD in a SEM. In V-units, the c-axis is declined about 35° from the normal of the coccolith plane and one of the ai-axes is roughly parallel to the coccolith plane. The c-axis in R-units is slightly oblique to the radial direction along the coccolith plane and one of the ai-axes is near vertical to the coccolith plane. The projections of the c-axis of V- and R-units on the coccolith plane deviate considerably from the normal of the coccolith circumference, giving a crystallographic chiral property. The atomic arrangements of calcite contacted with the organic base plate are discussed for both units based on the crystallographic orientations derived from EBSD measurements.

Key Words: Biomineralization • coccolith • EBSD • SEM • calcite




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
K. Saruwatari, N. Ozaki, H. Nagasawa, and T. Kogure
Comparison of crystallographic orientations between living (Emiliania huxleyi and Gephyrocapsa oceanica) and fossil (Watznaueria barnesiae) coccoliths using electron microscopes
American Mineralogist, October 1, 2008; 93(10): 1670 - 1677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by Mineralogical Society of America