Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; April 2006; v. 91; no. 4; p. 609-618; DOI: 10.2138/am.2006.2090
© 2006 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data Info
Right arrow Supplementary Data Info
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Post, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Water in the interlayer region of birnessite: Importance in cation exchange and structural stability

Elizabeth A. Johnson1,2,* and Jeffrey E. Post1

1 Smithsonian Institution, Department of Mineral Sciences, National Museum of Natural History, MRC 0119, Washington, D.C. 20560-0119, U.S.A.
2 University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Earth and Space Sciences, 595 Charles Young Drive East, 3806 Geology Building, Los Angeles, California 90095-1567, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: johnsoel{at}ucla.edu

Birnessite is an important scavenger of trace metals in soils and aqueous environments. The basic birnessite-type structure consists of sheets of Mn octahedra separated by ~7 or ~10 Å ("buserite") interlayer regions filled with cations and water. Synthetic birnessite-like structures were produced through cation exchange reactions with synthetic Na-birnessite. The unheated, synthetic Mg2+, Ca2+, and Ni2+ layer structures have an ~10 Å interlayer spacing, whereas the other cation-exchanged synthetic birnessites and the related mineral chalcophanite have an interlayer spacing of ~7 Å. The Li+, Na+, K+, Cs+, and Pb2+ synthetic birnessites each contain two to three structurally different water sites, as evidenced by multiple H2O bending and stretching modes in the infrared spectra. The complexity of the water bands in these spectra is likely related to disordering of cations on the interlayer sites. H-birnessite contains structural water and either hydroxyl, hydronium (H3O+), or both. The small difference in the width of the water stretching modes between room temperature and –180 °C indicates that the water molecules in birnessite-like structures are predominantly structurally, rather than dynamically, disordered. Most of the synthetic birnessites, including Na- and K-birnessite, undergo significant water loss at temperatures below 100 °C. There is a linear relationship between the temperature at which most of the water is lost from a given cation-exchanged birnessite and the heat of hydration of the interlayer cation. This finding implies that the interlayer water is strongly bound to the interlayer cations, and plays an important role in the thermal stability of birnessite-like structures.

Key Words: Birnessite • electron microscopy • IR spectroscopy • order-disorder • thermodynamics • XRD data




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
C. L. Lopano, P. J. Heaney, and J. E. Post
Cs-exchange in birnessite: Reaction mechanisms inferred from time-resolved X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy
American Mineralogist, May 1, 2009; 94(5-6): 816 - 826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A. M. Elprince, W. H. Mohamed, and E. M. El-Wakil
Kinetics of Nonenzymatic Decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide by Torrifluvents
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 11, 2008; 72(1): 83 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America