Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; May 2006; v. 91; no. 5-6; p. 740-746; DOI: 10.2138/am.2006.1887
© 2006 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohuchi, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Baer, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Chemical bonding and electronic structures of the Al2SiO5 polymorphs, andalusite, sillimanite, and kyanite: X-ray photoelectron- and electron energy loss spectroscopy studies

Fumio S. Ohuchi1, Subrata Ghose2, Mark H. Engelhard3 and Donald R. Baer3

1 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Box 352120, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, U.S.A.
2 Department of Earth and Space Science, Box 351310, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, U.S.A.
3 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Environmental Molecular Science Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: ohuchi{at}u.washington.edu

We have undertaken a detailed analysis of the X-ray photoelectron spectra obtained from the three polymorphs of Al2SiO5; andalusite, sillimanite, and kyanite. Comparison of the spectra was made based on the chemical bonding and structural differences in the Al- and Si-coordination within each polymorph. The spectra for Si(2p) for all three polymorphs are nearly identical, consistent with the fact that all the Si atoms are in 4-fold (tetrahedral) coordination, whereas the binding energies, peak shapes, and peak widths for Al(2p) vary depending on the type of polymorph. The upper-valence band for all three polymorphs is characterized by four main features derived from O(2p), Al(3s), Al(2p), Si(3s), and Si(3p), and the differences in their contributions are observed. The density of state of the Al2SiO5 polymorphs is relatively featureless compared to those observed from {alpha}-SiO2 and {alpha}-Al2O3, suggesting that the orbital overlaps span a greater range in energy. The observed band gap energy for Al2SiO5 (sillimanite) was ~9.1eV, a value in between those for {alpha}-SiO2 (~8.6eV) and {alpha}-Al2O3 (~9.6eV). The conduction band feature of Al2SiO5 was experimentally compared to those of {alpha}-SiO2 and {alpha}-Al2O3, and shown that it is indeed intermediate between the {alpha}-SiO2 and {alpha}-Al2O3 phases.

Key Words: Al2SiO5 polymorphs • X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy • low electron energy loss spectroscopy • valence- and conduction band structures • andalusite • sillimanite • kyanite




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
S. Aryal, P. Rulis, and W.Y. Ching
Density functional calculations of the electronic structure and optical properties of aluminosilicate polymorphs (Al2SiO5)
American Mineralogist, January 1, 2008; 93(1): 114 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America