Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; May 2006; v. 91; no. 5-6; p. 831-849; DOI: 10.2138/am.2006.1815
© 2006 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow supplementary Data Info
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mercier, P. H.J.
Right arrow Articles by Kodama, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Upper limit of the tetrahedral rotation angle and factors affecting octahedral flattening in synthetic and natural 1M polytype C2/m space group micas

Patrick H.J. Mercier1, Denis G. Rancourt2,*, Guenther J. Redhammer3, André E. Lalonde4, Jean-Louis Robert5, Rob G. Berman6 and Hideomi Kodama7

1 Institute for Chemical Process and Environmental Technology, National Research Council Canada, 1200 Montreal Road, Building M-12, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R6, Canada
2 Department of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada
3 Institute of Mineralogy, University of Salzburg, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
4 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada
5 Centre de Recherches sur la Synthèse et la Chimie des Minéraux (CRSCM), CNRS, 1A, Rue de la Férollerie, F45071 Orléans, Cédex 2, France
6 Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8, Canada
7 ECORC Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6, Canada

Correspondence: * E-mail: dgr{at}physics.uottawa.ca

We have used recently developed quantitative crystal chemical models and a simple structural free-energy model to examine and interpret: (1) previously reported powder X-ray diffraction data for several trioctahedral mica solid solution series (64 synthetic powder samples between the Mg, Co, Ni, and Fe end-members, with different degrees of oxidation, vacancy contents, and Al/Si ratios; indexed as 1M polytype, space group C2/m; supplemented here by 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy to obtain accurate iron-site populations of IVFe3+, VIFe3+, and VIFe2+), and (2) 175 previously published single-crystal refinements comprising 138 natural and 37 synthetic 1M mica samples refined in space group C2/m. The crystal chemical models were validated by comparisons between predicted and measured relations between structural parameters, and needed model parameters and their uncertainties were extracted, using the single-crystal refinements. Two main results arise. First, an observed limit value of the b lattice parameter in certain synthetic solid solution series is shown to correspond to an upper limit value for the tetrahedral rotation angle {alpha} of {alpha}max = 9.5° for AlSi3 tetrahedral sheets in K-rich micas. This upper limit is also clearly seen in the single-crystal refinement data for those K-rich single-crystals that have near-AlSi3 tetrahedral compositions. We argue that the (tetrahedral sheet composition dependent) upper limit of tetrahedral rotation is an intrinsic property of the tetrahedral sheet (presumably corresponding to an intra-tetrahedral-sheet bond-bending limit) rather than arising either from interactions with the interlayer cations or from an octahedral sheet lateral-contraction limit. Second, we find that, except in the extreme cases where one approaches the lower ({alpha} = 0°) or upper ({alpha} = {alpha}max) tetrahedral rotation limits, the magnitude of the octahedral flattening angle {psi} is predominantly determined by octahedral cation stereo-chemical bonding requirements (and other intra-octahedral-sheet properties such as intra-sheet bond bending and intra-sheet electrostatic forces) rather than arising from tetrahedral-octahedral inter-sheet interactions (as generally argued or assumed). In addition, we corroborate a previously reported difference in the crystal chemical behaviors of trivalent octahedral cation (Fe3+, Al3+) and vacancy-bearing trioctahedral micas relative to samples that contain only divalent octahedral cations (e.g., Fe-Mg, Fe-Ni, Mg-Ni, and Co-Mg synthetic series); their b vs. average octahedral metal-oxygen bond-length behaviors are dramatically different, a result that is consistent with our proposed dominant stereo-chemical control of {psi}.

Key Words: Crystal chemistry • layer silicate • mica • tetrahedral rotation • inter-sheet matching • octahedral flattening




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
S. Matarrese, E. Schingaro, F. Scordari, F. Stoppa, G. Rosatelli, G. Pedrazzi, and L. Ottolini
Crystal chemistry of phlogopite from Vulture-S. Michele Subsynthem volcanic rocks (Mt. Vulture, Italy) and volcanological implications
American Mineralogist, February 1, 2008; 93(2-3): 426 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America