Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; July 2006; v. 91; no. 7; p. 1142-1149; DOI: 10.2138/am.2006.2078
© 2006 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuwahara, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

In-situ AFM study of smectite dissolution under alkaline conditions at room temperature

Yoshihiro Kuwahara

Department of Evolution of Earth Environments, Graduate School of Social and Cultural Studies, Kyushu University, Ropponmatsu, Fukuoka 810-8560, Japan

Correspondence: * E-mail: ykuwa{at}scs.kyushu-u.ac.jp

An experimental study on smectite dissolution was carried out using in-situ TMAFM and CMAFM (tapping mode and contact mode atomic force microscopy, respectively) analyses at 25 °C under alkaline conditions. Smectite particles dissolved via the retreat of the edge surfaces without scratching by the AFM tip, except in a series of the dissolution experiment in CMAFM. The retreat of each straightened edge surface appeared to occur with a constant rate. In contrast, the basal surface was unreactive within the experimental duration. The dissolution rates normalized to the edge surface area (ESA) of smectite at a certain pH and temperature condition, therefore, had a constant value independent of the particle size, whereas the dissolution rates normalized to the total surface area (TSA) varied with the particle size. These dissolution rates were consistent with those derived from wet-chemical data in previous studies. The anisotropic dissolution behavior was also observed along the ESA, that is, the retreat of dissolution fronts along the {110} faces was much faster than that along {010} faces. This difference can be explained by smectite dissolution under alkaline conditions being controlled by OH attack, which is catalyzed by protonated Al-OH groups, on the bridging O atoms of both Al-O-Si sites, which locate only on the {110} surfaces, and Al2-O-Si sites on the {010} and {110} surfaces. The bridging O atoms of Al2-O-Si sites on the {010} surfaces are buried more deeply in the structure than those of Al-O-Si sites on the {110} surfaces, which would be more difficult to attack on the {010} surfaces.

Key Words: AFM • in-situ TMAFM in liquid • smectite dissolution • kinetics • surface studies • smectite




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
Y. Kuwahara
In situ observations of muscovite dissolution under alkaline conditions at 25-50 {degrees}C by AFM with an air/fluid heater system
American Mineralogist, July 1, 2008; 93(7): 1028 - 1033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America