Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
American Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
American Mineralogist; January 2007; v. 92; no. 1; p. 72-79; DOI: 10.2138/am.2007.2252
© 2007 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loomer, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Cogswell, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Manganese valence imaging in Mn minerals at the nanoscale using STEM-EELS

Diana B. Loomer1, Tom A. Al1,*, Louise Weaver2 and Steven Cogswell2

1 Department of Geology, University of New Brunswick, P.O. Box 4400, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5A3, Canada
2 Microscopy and Microanalysis Facility, University of New Brunswick, P.O. Box 4400, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5A3, Canada

Correspondence: * E-mail: tal{at}unb.ca

Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) was used with scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) to quantify the average Mn valence in natural minerals at the nanometer scale. A method was developed to calibrate the energy-loss scale accurately, providing a comparison between STEM-EELS and the X-ray absorption spectroscopy methods that investigate the L-edge chemical shift as Mn valence changes. The chemical-shift measurements were consistent with data reported by previous researchers from both X-ray and electron energy-loss spectroscopy. The L3/L2 white-line intensity ratios also were consistent with previous work. A calibration curve for Mn valence was produced using the L3/L2 white-line intensity ratios from measurements of synthetic standards. The average Mn valence was determined because it is not possible to distinguish Mn3+ from mixtures of Mn2+ and Mn4+ using either method. The white-line intensity method was implemented in automated software that allows for rapid processing of point spectra, and 1-D and 2-D spectrum images. Point analyses of two natural pyrolusite samples indicated a Mn valence of 4.0, and point analyses of romanechite and manganite gave values of 3.8 and 3.4, respectively. An interface between braunite and bementite was used to illustrate 1-D and 2-D spectrum-imaging capabilities. The measured valence of Mn in the braunite and bementite was 2.9 and 2.0, respectively; both consistent with theoretical values. The braunite-bementite sample demonstrated the heterogeneity of Mn valence common to natural minerals and the advantages of acquiring quantitative valence information in a known spatial context.

Key Words: Electron microscopy • electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) • scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) • spectrum imaging • valence mapping • manganese • Mn valence • pyrolusite • manganite • romanechite • braunite • bementite






JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America