Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist RIMG advertisement
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; November-December; v. 92; no. 11-12; p. 1881-1898; DOI: 10.2138/am.2007.2326
© 2007 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data Info
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spera, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ghiorso, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Partitioning of trace elements among coexisting crystals, melt, and supercritical fluid during isobaric crystallization and melting

Frank J. Spera1,*, Wendy A. Bohrson2, christy B. Till3,{dagger} and Mark S. Ghiorso4

1 Department of Earth Science and Institute for Crustal Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA
2 Department of Geological Sciences, Central Washington University, Ellensburg, Washington 98926, USA
3 Department of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA
4 OFM Research-West, 7336 24th Avenue NE, Seattle, Washington 98115, USA

Correspondence: * E-mail: spera{at}geol.ucsb.edu

The distribution of trace elements among coexisting crystals, melt, and supercritical fluid during melting and crystallization is a critical constraint for understanding the evolution of magmatic systems, including the origin and development of continental and oceanic crust. Although trace-element partitioning between crystals and melt during Rayleigh fractional crystallization or melting is well-known, partitioning among co-existing melt, crystals, and supercritical fluid during anatexis or crystallization is less explored despite the ubiquity of magmatic fluids. Here we develop the trace-element differential equations governing solid-melt-fluid equilibria for melting and crystallization under fluid-present conditions and provide analytical solutions for fractional and equilibrium crystallization and melting. A compilation of solid-fluid and melt-fluid distribution coefficients for about 30 trace elements in olivine, clinopyroxene, garnet, plagioclase, alkali feldspar, biotite, amphibole, apatite, and silicic melts is provided. Forward modeling demonstrates the conditions under which fluid-melt-solid partitioning will impact trace-element signatures in magmatic systems. We show that for trace elements soluble in aqueous fluids, the composition of a melt derived by fluid-present fractional crystallization or by fluid-present fractional melting will be significantly different than in otherwise comparable fluid-absent systems. Ignoring the partitioning of soluble elements into the fluid phase leads to large errors in concentrations (over 100%) and ratios and consequent misinterpretation of the trace-element character of source material and/or the processes of fractional crystallization and melting. Although significant in any setting involving fluid-present equilibria, this analysis may have a most profound influence on fluid-present subduction zone magma generation and the evolution of shallow level fluid-saturated silicic magmatic systems.

Key Words: Distribution coefficient • fluid-saturated magma • fluid-melt • solid-melt • trace element







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America