Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
American Mineralogist RIMG advertisement
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
American Mineralogist; November-December; v. 92; no. 11-12; p. 1936-1945; DOI: 10.2138/am.2007.2408
© 2007 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amenta, R.
Right arrow Articles by Wertz, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A modeling approach to understanding the role of microstructure development on crystal-size distributions and on recovering crystal-size distributions from thin slices

Roddy Amenta*, Anne Ewing, Amy Jensen, Sarah Roberts, Krista Stevens, Michelle Summa, Stephanie Weaver and Paxton Wertz

Department of Geology and Environmental Science, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807, USA

Correspondence: * E-mail: amentarv{at}jmu.edu

Computer modeling of microstructure development was used to determine whether competition for space among growing crystals modifies the crystal-size distribution (CSD) predicted by the crystallization kinetics. Microstructures were modeled with prisms, plates, and cuboids, respectively. In all cases, the true CSDs calculated from crystal volumes in the microstructure corresponded closely with the linear ideal CSDs predicted by crystallization equations indicating that grain impingements did not significantly modify the predicted CSD information. Crystal intersection widths and lengths were measured in 2-dimensional slices through the microstructures to test if the CSD information could be recovered. For prisms and plates, the recovered CSDs compared favorably with the true CSDs, but cuboids yielded mixed results depending on their shapes and need further study. For prisms, the recovered CSDs were linear and for plates slightly curvilinear. These results indicate that rocks with recovered, curvilinear CSDs should be interpreted cautiously as indicators of complex crystallization histories, and that petrographic examination should have precedence in such interpretations.

Key Words: Crystal-size distribution • CSD • microstructure • computer modeling






JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by Mineralogical Society of America