Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist house ad
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; February 2007; v. 92; no. 2-3; p. 281-288; DOI: 10.2138/am.2007.2212
© 2007 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitney, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cook, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Hardness, toughness, and modulus of some common metamorphic minerals

Donna L. Whitney1,*, Margaret Broz2 and Robert F. Cook2,{dagger}

1 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, U.S.A.
2 Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: dwhitney{at}umn.edu

Studies of the hardness and toughness of minerals have historically focused on minerals of the Mohs scale, although, with the exceptions of quartz, orthoclase, and calcite, Mohs phases are not common rock-forming minerals. We report new hardness (H), toughness (resistance to fracture, KIC), and indentation modulus (E*) data obtained by microhardness and depth-sensing indentation (DSI, or nanoindentation) experiments for common metamorphic minerals: sillimanite, kyanite, andalusite, garnet, quartz, and orthoclase feldspar. Because the experimental techniques involve indentation-induced cracking as well as depth-sensing indentation, the new data set can be used to investigate a range of plastic behavior for minerals in the crust and mantle.

The three Al2SiO5 polymorphs have similar H values (~10–12 GPa): kyanite has the largest values and andalusite the smallest. These values are similar to that of quartz (~12 GPa) and greater than that of orthoclase (~7 GPa). Garnet H values vary with composition: for grossular, H ~ 13 GPa, and for almandine-pyrope, H ~ 15 GPa. Although H values for the minerals we analyzed span a range of ~10 GPa, most fracture toughness values are between 1–1.8 MPa·m1/2. Garnet is much harder than Al2SiO5, but has a similar to slightly lower KIC (grossular ~1.2 MPa·m1/2; almandine-pyrope ~1.4 MPa·m1/2; andalusite 1.8 MPa·m1/2; sillimanite 1.6 MPa·m1/2); kyanite KIC is difficult to measure owing to the ease with which kyanite cleaves. Garnet has properties similar to those of cubic zirconia (ZrO2), which we measured as a reference. Another reference mineral, periclase (MgO), has the lowest H (~5 GPa) and the highest KIC (~4 MPa·m1/2) of minerals we measured. Among the silicates, E* varies significantly from orthoclase (~89 GPa) to quartz (~117 GPa) to garnet (245–260 GPa), and Al2SiO5 has intermediate values: kyanite ~ 186–253 GPa, sillimanite ~ 207 GPa, andalusite ~ 232 GPa.

Key Words: Fracture toughness • hardness • indentation • metamorphic minerals • modulus • mechanical properties • garnet • quartz • Al2SiO5




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
A. Mikowski, P. Soares, F. Wypych, and C. M. Lepienski
Fracture toughness, hardness, and elastic modulus of kyanite investigated by a depth-sensing indentation technique
American Mineralogist, May 1, 2008; 93(5-6): 844 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America