Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; February 2007; v. 92; no. 2-3; p. 429-432; DOI: 10.2138/am.2007.2472
© 2007 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salje, E. K.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Letter

An empirical scaling model for averaging elastic properties including interfacial effects

Ekhard K.H. Salje*

Department of Earth Sciences, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, U.K.

Correspondence: * E-mail: ekhard{at}esc.cam.ac.uk

The elastic properties of ceramics and a mix of minerals can be calculated in a simple way including some properties of the interfaces between grains. While the Hashin Shtrikman averaging method has bounds, which are strictly correct for many realistic physical conditions, one finds empirical data which lie outside these bonds. One possible interpretation is that the scaling of the volume proportions in mineral assemblies is not truly represented by the nominal volume proportion f of each phase. It is argued that interfacial effects scale with f(1 – f). In the case of certain assemblies, it is shown that the scaling is entirely with f2 rather than f. For intermediate cases, a more realistic scaling replaces f in the relevant averaging schemes by f(1 – S) + S f2 where S weighs the effect of the non-linearities in the volume expansion of the averaging schemes.

Key Words: Compressibility • mechanical properties • elastic moduli • surfaces




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J MineralHome page
R. J. Angel, J. M. Jackson, H. J. Reichmann, and S. Speziale
Elasticity measurements on minerals: a review
European Journal of Mineralogy, June 1, 2009; 21(3): 525 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America