Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Drits, V. A. Articles by Gaillot, A.-C. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Birnessite polytype systematics and identification by powder X-ray diffraction

¹ Environmental Geochemistry Group, LGIT—Maison des Géosciences, University of Grenoble—CNRS, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
² Geological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 7 Pyzhevsky Street, 109017 Moscow, Russia

Correspondence: ^* E-mail: bruno.lanson{at}obs.ujf-grenoble.fr

The polytypes of birnessite with a periodic stacking along the c* axis of one-, two-, and three-layers are derived in terms of an anion close-packing formalism. Birnessite layers may be stacked so as to build two types of interlayers: P-type in which basal O atoms from adjacent layers coincide in projection along the c* axis, thus forming interlayer prisms; and, O-type in which these O atoms form interlayer octahedra. The polytypes can be categorized into three groups that depend on the type of interlayers: polytypes consisting of homogeneous interlayers of O- or P-type, and polytypes in which both interlayer types alternate. Ideal birnessite layers can be described by a hexagonal unit cell (a_h = b_h 2.85 Å and = 120°) or by an orthogonal C-centered cell (a = 3 b, b_h = 2.85 Å, and = 90°); and, hexagonal birnessite polytypes (1H, 2H₁, 2H₂, 3R₁, 3R₂, 3H₁, and 3H₂) have orthogonal analogs (1O, 2O₁, 2O₂, 1M₁, 1M₂, 3O₁, and 3O₂).

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns from different polytypes having the same layer symmetry and the same number of layers per unit cell exhibit hkl reflections at identical 2 positions. XRD patterns corresponding to such polytypes differ only by their hkl intensity distributions, thus leading to possible ambiguities in polytype identification. In addition, the characteristics of the birnessite XRD patterns depend not only on the layer stacking but also on the presence of vacant layer sites, and on the type, location, and local environment of interlayer cations.

Several structure models are described for birnessite consisting of orthogonal vacancy-free or of hexagonal vacancy-bearing layers. These models differ by their stacking modes and by their interlayer structures, which contain mono-, di-, or trivalent cations. Calculated XRD patterns for these models show that the hkl intensity distributions are determined by the polytype, with limited influence of the interlayer structure. Actual structures of phyllomanganates can thus be approximated by idealized models for polytype identification purpose. General rules for this identification are formulated. Finally, the occurrence of the different polytypes among natural and synthetic birnessite described in the literature is considered with special attention given to poorly understood structural and crystal-chemical features.

Key Words: Birnessite • polytype • phyllomanganate • Mn oxide

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Grangeon, B. Lanson, M. Lanson, and A. Manceau Crystal structure of Ni-sorbed synthetic vernadite: a powder X-ray diffraction study Mineralogical Magazine, July 15, 2009; 72(6): 1279 - 1291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]