Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; May 2007; v. 92; no. 5-6; p. 863-872; DOI: 10.2138/am.2007.2275
© 2007 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data Info
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dzikowski, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Grew, E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The geometric effects of VFe2+ for VMg substitution on the crystal structures of the grandidierite-ominelite series

Tashia J. Dzikowski1, Lee A. Groat1,* and Edward S. Grew2

1 Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of British Columbia, 6339 Stores Road, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
2 Department of Geological Sciences, University of Maine, 5790 Bryand Research Center, Orono, Maine 04469-5790, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: lgroat{at}eos.ubc.ca

The electron microprobe compositions and crystal structure of seven members of the grandidierite-ominelite (MgAl3BSiO9–Fe2+Al3BSiO9) series with X = (Fe2+ + Mn + Zn)/(Fe2+ + Mn + Zn + Mg) ranging from 0.00 to 0.52 were studied to determine the geometric effects of Fe substitution for Mg on the crystal structures. Calculating Fe3+ from the electron microprobe analyses gave 0.04–0.06 Fe3+ apfu, but such small amounts at the Al sites could not be detected in the refinements. Regression equations derived from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data show that b increases by 0.18 Å from X = 0–1. The crystal structure refinements show that the most significant changes involve the (Mg,Fe2+)O5 polyhedron, which increases in volume by 0.36 Å3 (5.0%), largely as a result of expansion of the MgFe-O5, -O2, and -O6 (x2) bond distances, which increase by 0.09 (4.4%), 0.06, and 0.04 Å, respectively. Other significant changes include increasing O1-MgFe-O2 (3.44°) and -Al3-O5a angles (1.9°) and a decreasing O6-MgFe-O6b (–2.20°) angle. Significant increases are also seen in the lengths of the O1–O2 (0.13 Å) and O6-O5a (x2) (0.09 Å) edges. The SiO4 tetrahedra appear to respond to changes in the surrounding polyhedra by changing O-Si-O angles such that the tetrahedral angle variance and mean tetrahedral quadratic elongation increase with X. The BO3 triangles appear to behave as relatively invariant units in the crystal structure.

Regression equations obtained from the MgFe-O bond distances were used to determine a radius for VFe2+ of 0.70 Å. Although our samples show little Mn, the presence of Mn2+ at the MgFe site would be expected to cause more distortion than an equivalent amount of Fe2+. Substitution of Zn likely would have little effect. The presence of Cr3+ at any of the Al sites would be expected to increase the size of the coordination sphere, but the substitution of P5+ for Si at the Si sites would most likely decrease the Si-O bond distances.

Key Words: Grandidierite • ominelite • crystal structure • substitution • borosilicates







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America